These just in … The degree of subterfuge and secrecy surround this project is very disturbing and perhaps telling.
These just in … The degree of subterfuge and secrecy surround this project is very disturbing and perhaps telling.
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-cost-of-the-b-21-bomber-is-secret-for-security-reas-1781576157
excellent article … and one of the most under-reported stories. The computer-generated artist’s concept is a joke … I attended an aerospace conference last month and some big shot from Northrop Grummon Aerospace Systems was a keynote speaker … a slide of the alleged B-21 concept came up on a big screen. “It’s an interesting photo. I’ll leave it at that,” he says. And this was greeted by a round of laughter from the audience … What’s not known is whether any members of Congress are privy to the cost figures. If not, where’s the oversight? I find it intriguing that one top military official has told the media that the platform is using “very mature” technology. But he also said, just because it’s very mature “doesn’t mean it’s known to the public.” Whaaaat?
Interesting article:
http://www.rollcall.com/news/policy/senators-quietly-voted-keep-bomber-costs-secret
Perhaps there’s a reason for the extreme secrecy surrounding this program. Perhaps the bomber is based on a fundamentally different technology.
https://mondediplo.com/openpage/the-pentagon-s-war-on-accountability
Here’s the nut graph:
The United States is on track to spend more than $600 billion on the military this year — more, that is, than wasspent at the height of President Ronald Reagan’s Cold War military buildup, and more than the military budgets of at least the next seven nations in the world combined. And keep in mind that that’s just a partial total. As an analysis by the Straus Military Reform Project has shown, if we count related activities like homeland security, veterans’ affairs, nuclear warhead production at the Department of Energy, military aid to other countries, and interest on the military-related national debt, that figure reaches a cool $1 trillion.
it’s too bad the American media are ignoring this issue, a great failing of the Fourth Estate.
… yes, he is right, it is ridiculous for the Air Force to assert that revealing the B-21’s cost would jeopardize its secrecy. Truly absurd. Thanks to Anthony Capaccio.
A top Northrop Grumman executive spoke during an aerospace conference in Indianapolis on Thursday (April 14). During his talk, he displayed the Air Force’s artist’s concept for the mysterious bomber.
“It’s an interesting photo. I’ll leave it at that,” he said.
http://www.ifreepress.com/6488-air-force-very-close-to-picking-new-bomber/
From top Air Force acquisition executive William LaPlante:
According to LaPlant, the project was designed so that bombers could be easily upgraded when new technology emerges or new requirements are written.
He said the bomber would have a few components that were now being used in secret programs and that “just because they are existing (or) mature doesn’t mean that they are in the open, doesn’t mean that any of you even know about them”.
an intriguing yarn worth further explorations …
A very dubious but entertaining discussion of alleged existence of TR-3B … all spurred by an equally dubious sighting on the Moon … which is probably just some sort of mundane imaging artifact … yet, we indulge ourselves …