As we ponder Einstein’s aloofness to the Washington flying saucers of 1952, was this bizarre event a deliberate demonstration ordered by Harry Truman?

There has been some online chatter lately about Albert Einstein’s odd memo regarding flying saucers over Washington, D.C., in 1952.

https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/albert-einstein-ufo-letter

As the above article informs us, Einstein says in his missive, “Those people have seen something. What it is I do not know and am not curious to know.”

Einstein’s lack of curiosity pretty much sums up the smug aloofness of the scientific establishment toward the entire subject of UFOs going back decades. However, we must welcome any fleeting mainstream interest in this crucial event in the ongoing history of UFOs. It was, to be sure, an extraordinary affair in which UFOs buzzed the nation’s capital and eluded the best fighter jets of the time.

But were these UFOs of alien origin?

Instead, I propose that this was a deliberate demonstration ordered by President Harry Truman, and that the flying saucers were in fact advanced U.S. weapons under development since the end of World War II.

For those who are unfamiliar with this critically important happening in the canon of UFO lore, this article from the History Channel is a good backgrounder: https://www.history.com/news/ufos-washington-white-house-air-force-coverup

Anyway, as I was saying, my proposal is that the UFO flyovers were, in fact, demonstrations ordered by a skeptical president to prove the value of these platforms at a time when the military was seeking greater funding for the above-top-secret weapons.

After all, Truman pulled a similar stunt earlier in his presidency, when he ordered that Northrop’s experimental Flying Wing aircraft be flown over the capital to show its prowess. Unfortunately, the demonstration was marred by engine trouble, and this damaged its credibility going forward.

By contrast, the flying saucers were a swimming success, easily out-performing state-of-the-art jet fighters. And the rest can be found somewhere in the unwritten history of UFOs and the Pentagon. But I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Yes, Mr. Pope, UFOs disarmed U.S. nukes, and it was probably the Pentagon

Noticed this interview with Nick Pope.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6318781839112

I propose this was the U.S. military demonstrating an above-top-secret method to neutralize nuclear weapons, on the theory that, if we could shut down our own nukes, that means we’d be able to shut down Soviet nukes.

So, assuming we already had advanced field-propulsion vehicles in the 1960s, this super-secret weapon was outfitted with electromagnetic pulse technology capable of bombarding the hardened electronics in nuclear missile systems. This would have temporarily taken down the system. Following this line of reasoning, only a select group of military brass would know the real story behind the events. Only they would have a “need to know,” which explains why launch officials would to this day remain clueless about the true nature of what happened.

Also, in at least one example, a flying-saucer-like vehicle was seen following a missile as it was being launched, shinning a bright light onto the missile. I propose this light was possibly a high-intensity strobe that simulated gunfire or cannon fire.

I know this all sounds wild, but is it really any crazier than space aliens?

We know something radical happened. These encounters have been documented. The sources are impeccable. Rather than ET, however, I propose that it was just us all along.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Rep. Burchett is right about one thing: There is a huge UFO coverup

Congressman Tim Burchett is obviously a proponent of the wrongminded ET hypothesis – the idea that space aliens are behind UFOs – which, unfortunately, has been dominating the discussion about UFOs like FOREVER.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tim-burchett-ufos_n_63c4f371e4b0d6f0ba06361e

However, I give him kudos for being correct about one overarching issue: There is a HUGE UFO coverup in this country.  

At this point, it should be obvious that the Pentagon is hiding the truth about UFOs, in my opinion because officials have no real choice: The UFOs are above-top-secret U.S. weapons based on a revolutionary propulsion technology, call it field propulsion, antigravity, or whatever label you prefer. Therefore, the Pentagon certainly can’t tell Congress and the public the truth about these secret weapons because then they would no longer be, well, secret.

The reason human pilots can withstand the crushing G-forces that would be generated by something like the Tic Tac platform is because it is based on a different kind of physics. As our friends at Monty Python’s Flying Circus might say, and now for something completely different.

Going even further, I would suggest that the U.S. military has possessed this propulsion breakthrough, in one form or another, for many decades, going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, and it has been steadily evolving since then totally shrouded from the public.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

The Latest Big UFO Report is Bogus: The Pentagon Knows Exactly What They Are

So, why aren’t foreign military branches experiencing the same epidemic of UFO encounters? Why aren’t the UFOs cruising over New York City, Los Angeles, Paris, London, etc., on a regular basis?

Answer: Because the UFOs are advanced, above-top-secret U.S. weapons so classified they can’t be divulged to Congress, other members of the military, the president or anyone else lacking a “need to know.”

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/highly-anticipated-government-report-on-ufos-thin-on-new-evidence

At this point, I don’t know what the media are confused about. There has obviously been a huge breakthrough in propulsion technology. That’s why we’re seeing these encounters taking place on U.S. military training ranges. The pilots are U.S. military pilots, and they are training exactly where they should be training, over U.S. military facilities.

The Pentagon can’t divulge what these secret weapons are because, well, then they would no longer be secret. Duh!

This means the Luis Elizondos, the Tom DeLonges, To The Stars Academy, the late Harry Reid, etc., etc., etc. … all they’ve succeeded in doing is to unwittingly expose an above-top-secret U.S. military program based on field propulsion, antigravity, or whatever label you would like to apply.

Now that we’ve seen it, yeah, the B-21 bomber is definitely a flying saucer!

I speculated in a post about two weeks before the unveiling that the B-21 might be a “flying saucer.”

Now that we have seen it, or part of it, anyway, I’m doubling down: The thing is definitely a flying saucer!

As such, let’s just come right out and say it: It might be harnessing antigravity propulsion.

When I say flying saucer, I mean that, if not literally, then metaphorically. In other words, it’s not merely some iterative evolution of the B-2, as the official artist “interpretations” would have us believe.

It’s something different. In its recent twitter posting to announce the unveiling date, Northrop Grumman claims, “This changes everything.”

It’s probably just an exercise in corporate hyper-marketing, but if not, how does the B-21 change everything?  

For example, might it be capable of vertical takeoff and landing or hovering over a single location for hours at a time? Does the bomber possess radical new technology, possibly related to propulsion? Might it be capable of low-earth orbit?

There’s been a lot of talk about the B-21’s advanced prototyping, which has been a key factor in allowing Northrop Grumman to develop the bomber on time and on budget. In essence, components in the platform had already been designed, built and tested. Yet, the bomber was based on a “clean-sheet” design, meaning it is not an adaptation of the B-2 stealth bomber or other existing aircraft. Officials have also said the bomber is based on a “very mature” technology, yet not necessarily known to the public.

These two things seem contradictory: The bomber has largely been developed already, yet its design is not an extension of the B-2 or other aircraft. The technology is mature, yet unknown to the public.

What does it all mean?

Perhaps it means they’ve been flying this thing, in one form or another, for some time, existing entirely in the black. I would imagine there’s a whole grab bag of toys hidden under the cover of blackness waiting to be seeded into the white world. But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers.

As we near its historic unveiling, is the B-21 bomber a flying saucer?

Well, unless you’ve been living in a cave, you know by now that the much-anticipated rollout of the B-21 bomber is scheduled for Dec. 2. It is the most significant new military program in thirty years.

With the unveiling fast approaching, I thought it might be worth asking: Is the B-21 a flying saucer?

Answer: Hell yeah, the B-21 bomber’s a flying saucer, if not literally, then metaphorically. In other words, it’s not merely some iterative evolution of the B-2, as the official artist “interpretations” would have us believe.

It’s something different. In its recent twitter posting to announce the unveiling date, Northrop Grumman claims, “This changes everything.”

It’s probably just an exercise in corporate hyper-marketing, but if not, how does the B-21 change everything?  

For example, might it be capable of vertical takeoff and landing or hovering over a single location for hours at a time? Does the bomber possess radical new technology, possibly related to propulsion? Might it be capable of low-earth orbit?

There’s been a lot of talk about the B-21’s advanced prototyping, which has been a key factor in allowing Northrop Grumman to develop the bomber on time and on budget. In essence, components in the platform had already been designed, built and tested. Yet, the bomber was based on a “clean-sheet” design, meaning it is not an adaptation of the B-2 stealth bomber or other existing aircraft. Officials have also said the bomber is based on a “very mature” technology, yet not necessarily known to the public.

These two things seem contradictory: The bomber has largely been developed already, yet its design is not an extension of the B-2 or other aircraft. The technology is mature, yet unknown to the public.

What does it all mean?

Perhaps it means they’ve been flying this thing, in one form or another, for some time, existing entirely in the black. I would imagine there’s a whole grab bag of toys hidden under the cover of blackness waiting to be seeded into the white world. But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers.

Thanks, Wall Street Journal! People, and the media, are finally figuring it out: The UFOs aren’t ET.

Love this UFO opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal. It would appear that people — and the media — are finally figuring out that the UFOs aren’t piloted by space aliens. People are also starting to cast suspicion on the Pentagon for its apparent complicity in clouding the whole UFO issue and for its tacit support of the ET hypothesis. Why would this be? To confuse the public and protect secrets, silly.    

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ufo-uap-pentagon-nasa-sightings-classified-intelligence-media-bias-military-equipment-airspace-drone-11666978035

But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Navy pilot to Joe Rogan: The UFOs were probably classified U.S. military program

Interesting interview on Joe Rogan podcast:

https://www.newsweek.com/ufo-navy-pilot-joe-rogan-podcast-experience-ryan-graves-black-cube-latest-1753132

My big takeaway is this:

“Graves admitted that the mystery surrounding the UFOs did not mean that aliens, or something supernatural, were involved.

” ‘The high-probability answer was this was some type of classified program, of our own making, that had started operating in an area they were not supposed to, for whatever reason,’ Graves said.”

Chalk one up for the terrestrial hypothesis. The UFOs are designed, built and operated by an extremely advanced species: Homo sapiens.

People are starting to figure it out.

NASA is returning to the Moon, but has the Pentagon’s secret space program already gone interstellar?

Some five decades after planting an American flag on the lunar surface, NASA is returning to the Moon, and with much anticipation. Space.com explains:  

https://www.space.com/artemis-1-moon-mission-nasa-zero-hour-preview

But has the Pentagon’s shadow space program already reached Alpha Centauri and beyond, in an unprecedented military conspiracy spanning decades?

Let’s consider the following:

  1. It should be obvious by now that someone has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. U.S. Navy pilots have witnessed aviation platforms capable of astonishing performance, and commercial pilots also have reported encounters. These objects have been directly observed on U.S. military training ranges and also tracked by radar. There is no doubt that they do exist.
  2. It could be space aliens, or it could be earthlings. Up to this point, the ET hypothesis has dominated the conversation about UFOs. Just for the sake of argument, however, let’s consider the terrestrial hypothesis: that UFOs are super advanced technology developed right here on planet earth, brought to you by the same species that created things like nuclear weapons, microelectronics, nanoelectronics, lasers, fiberoptics, quantum computers, etc., etc.
  3. Then, following this line of reasoning, the nation most likely to have achieved this propulsion breakthrough over the past fifty years is the United States, given the unparalleled resources pumped year after year into military technology during the postwar period.
  4. Also, let us acknowledge that it is highly unlikely that the U.S. military would cede the conquest of space to the nation’s largely civilian space agency, NASA, especially when you consider that space represents the most profoundly important future military theater. Rather, if the Pentagon did possess an advanced propulsion system unlike anything else on the planet, it would secretly continue to exploit this fantastic strategic advantage, pushing farther into space while it enjoyed this temporary dominance over its adversaries.
  5. The Pentagon does not share information about its secret weapons with anyone, certainly not a secret of this magnitude. It would be a military conspiracy rivaled in modern history only by the Manhattan Project. Congress would simply not have a “need to know,” even in the face of the current investigations into UFOs. Knowledge of this new propulsion system would be strictly off limits to the public. Period.

So, this leaves us with a highly dysfunctional system in which commercial access and benefit to the general public are severely hampered by extreme secrecy. A system where NASA is struggling to return astronauts to the Moon half a century after achieving that feat, yet, unbeknownst to Congress and the executive branch, the military has made a quantum leap in space travel. A system in which the Pentagon has been charged by Congress to investigate UFOs, while this very same Congress is unaware that the UFOs are top secret U.S. weapons. The Pentagon can’t explain to Congress that the UFOs are secret U.S. weapons systems because then they would no longer be secret.

This scenario presents several absurdities. First, how can the Pentagon investigate UFOs when the UFOs are top secret U.S. military platforms? Second, you have two parallel space programs, one saddled with the severe limitations of chemical propulsion. The other, already operating vehicles capable of astonishing performance that can travel with equal proficiency in the atmosphere, under the oceans and in outer space.

Let’s assume the conspiracy began in the aftermath of World War II. That’s when the initial propulsion breakthrough becomes evident, with several key sightings: Kenneth Arnold’s encounter in 1947 and the 1952 UFO flap in Washington, D.C.

That means the conspiracy would be 75 years running!

Astronomers in Ukraine Detect, Measure UFOs in Broad Daylight over Kyiv

Ok, let’s just say it. This story is insane!

https://www.livescience.com/ukraine-ufo-uap-report

You have astronomers in the Ukraine detecting UFOs using specialized equipment intended for the study of meteors. The astronomers have not only categorized different types of UFOs, but also calculated their speeds.

The results are bonkers: UFOs, some traveling solo, others in “squadrons” and moving at speeds of 33,000 mph!

So, one of my big takeaways is that these observations were performed in broad daylight. This means the objects are traveling so fast the human eye and ordinary photographic equipment will not capture them. Doesn’t this also mean such UFOs could be flying all over the place, right over our heads, and we wouldn’t see them?

One would assume NASA, in connection with its own UFO study currently underway, would be peer-reviewing this work?

Well, whoever peer-reviews it, is should be interesting to see whether these findings are confirmed or supported by other experts.