#antigravity

As we ponder Einstein’s aloofness to the Washington flying saucers of 1952, was this bizarre event a deliberate demonstration ordered by Harry Truman?

There has been some online chatter lately about Albert Einstein’s odd memo regarding flying saucers over Washington, D.C., in 1952.

https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/albert-einstein-ufo-letter

As the above article informs us, Einstein says in his missive, “Those people have seen something. What it is I do not know and am not curious to know.”

Einstein’s lack of curiosity pretty much sums up the smug aloofness of the scientific establishment toward the entire subject of UFOs going back decades. However, we must welcome any fleeting mainstream interest in this crucial event in the ongoing history of UFOs. It was, to be sure, an extraordinary affair in which UFOs buzzed the nation’s capital and eluded the best fighter jets of the time.

But were these UFOs of alien origin?

Instead, I propose that this was a deliberate demonstration ordered by President Harry Truman, and that the flying saucers were in fact advanced U.S. weapons under development since the end of World War II.

For those who are unfamiliar with this critically important happening in the canon of UFO lore, this article from the History Channel is a good backgrounder: https://www.history.com/news/ufos-washington-white-house-air-force-coverup

Anyway, as I was saying, my proposal is that the UFO flyovers were, in fact, demonstrations ordered by a skeptical president to prove the value of these platforms at a time when the military was seeking greater funding for the above-top-secret weapons.

After all, Truman pulled a similar stunt earlier in his presidency, when he ordered that Northrop’s experimental Flying Wing aircraft be flown over the capital to show its prowess. Unfortunately, the demonstration was marred by engine trouble, and this damaged its credibility going forward.

By contrast, the flying saucers were a swimming success, easily out-performing state-of-the-art jet fighters. And the rest can be found somewhere in the unwritten history of UFOs and the Pentagon. But I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

The Latest Big UFO Report is Bogus: The Pentagon Knows Exactly What They Are

So, why aren’t foreign military branches experiencing the same epidemic of UFO encounters? Why aren’t the UFOs cruising over New York City, Los Angeles, Paris, London, etc., on a regular basis?

Answer: Because the UFOs are advanced, above-top-secret U.S. weapons so classified they can’t be divulged to Congress, other members of the military, the president or anyone else lacking a “need to know.”

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/highly-anticipated-government-report-on-ufos-thin-on-new-evidence

At this point, I don’t know what the media are confused about. There has obviously been a huge breakthrough in propulsion technology. That’s why we’re seeing these encounters taking place on U.S. military training ranges. The pilots are U.S. military pilots, and they are training exactly where they should be training, over U.S. military facilities.

The Pentagon can’t divulge what these secret weapons are because, well, then they would no longer be secret. Duh!

This means the Luis Elizondos, the Tom DeLonges, To The Stars Academy, the late Harry Reid, etc., etc., etc. … all they’ve succeeded in doing is to unwittingly expose an above-top-secret U.S. military program based on field propulsion, antigravity, or whatever label you would like to apply.

Now that we’ve seen it, yeah, the B-21 bomber is definitely a flying saucer!

I speculated in a post about two weeks before the unveiling that the B-21 might be a “flying saucer.”

Now that we have seen it, or part of it, anyway, I’m doubling down: The thing is definitely a flying saucer!

As such, let’s just come right out and say it: It might be harnessing antigravity propulsion.

When I say flying saucer, I mean that, if not literally, then metaphorically. In other words, it’s not merely some iterative evolution of the B-2, as the official artist “interpretations” would have us believe.

It’s something different. In its recent twitter posting to announce the unveiling date, Northrop Grumman claims, “This changes everything.”

It’s probably just an exercise in corporate hyper-marketing, but if not, how does the B-21 change everything?  

For example, might it be capable of vertical takeoff and landing or hovering over a single location for hours at a time? Does the bomber possess radical new technology, possibly related to propulsion? Might it be capable of low-earth orbit?

There’s been a lot of talk about the B-21’s advanced prototyping, which has been a key factor in allowing Northrop Grumman to develop the bomber on time and on budget. In essence, components in the platform had already been designed, built and tested. Yet, the bomber was based on a “clean-sheet” design, meaning it is not an adaptation of the B-2 stealth bomber or other existing aircraft. Officials have also said the bomber is based on a “very mature” technology, yet not necessarily known to the public.

These two things seem contradictory: The bomber has largely been developed already, yet its design is not an extension of the B-2 or other aircraft. The technology is mature, yet unknown to the public.

What does it all mean?

Perhaps it means they’ve been flying this thing, in one form or another, for some time, existing entirely in the black. I would imagine there’s a whole grab bag of toys hidden under the cover of blackness waiting to be seeded into the white world. But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers.

Pentagon’s big UFO reveal isn’t very revealing, maybe because flying saucers are probably from Utah, not Zeta Reticuli

Ok, so I’m not surprised the Pentagon is failing to satisfy the Congressional mandate to seriously investigate UFOs and to report the juicy details back to the taxpayers.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/ufo-briefings-congress-pentagon-00029315

This is an impossible task since revealing the true nature of UFOs, particularly those Tic Tac things and other seemingly alien wonders, would mean exposing above-top-secret U.S. military hardware.

So, yeah, flying saucers are probably from Utah, not Zeta Reticuli. But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Antigravity scientist evokes ghost of Thomas Townsend Brown

A scientist tells George Noory about Thomas Townsend Brown’s concepts, which, he says, could lead to a de facto antigravity propulsion system.

Here is an article quoting the scientist, Paul LaViolette, published in a tabloid, the Express.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1236266/mars-mission-nasa-journey-5-days-antigravity-thomas-brown-spahttps://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1236266/mars-mission-nasa-journey-5-days-antigravity-thomas-brown-space-sptce-spt

To this I say, Duh! Well, of course. The Pentagon perfected this sort of propulsion system a long time ago.

But, hey, if you’re paying any attention at all I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Was antigravity one of Vannevar Bush’s crazy ‘loonshots’?

Vannevar Bush’s approach to innovation is highlighted In the recently published book “Loonshots” by physicist Safi Bahcall.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/12/loonshots-and-phase-transitions-are-the-key-to-innovation-physicist-argues/

The book delves into the value of pursuing concepts deemed high risk by the research community.

I can think of one crazy idea he likely helped foster: antigravity.

But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!