Month: April 2024

Rep. Burchett to Fox News Digital: Pentagon Using ‘Diversion Tactics and Stonewalling’ to Hide the Truth About Major Defense Programs Associated with UFOs

Interesting Fox News Digital interview with Rep. Tim Burchett regarding his ongoing attempts to learn the truth about UFOs. There could be a reality miniseries here!

Anyway, I think he has pretty much nailed it when he says the Pentagon is using subterfuge to conceal the true nature of this phenomenon, not necessarily because there’s an extraterrestrial origin, but because of extreme secrecy surrounding military programs.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/governments-refusals-declassify-ufo-docs-is-cover-up-costing-taxpayers-millions-gop-congressman

Obviously, Rep. Burchett has chosen to focus his ire on government spending because that’s his political leaning, and it’s certainly true that there’s a considerable “black budget” that conceals spending from the public.

I would argue, though, that there’s something a lot more interesting and intriguing going on here: Not the spending per se, but specifically how this funding is related to UFOs. A very compelling hypothesis is that the Pentagon is concealing technological breakthroughs that are so unconventional they could easily be mistaken for extraterrestrial.

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, former head of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), has alluded to this possibility in his writings and statements, and so has AARO’s official UFO report that reviews sightings and encounters going back to 1945.

Both sources have unequivocally stated that witnesses, including members of the military, have unwittingly observed top-secret technologies and have mistaken these systems for extraterrestrial visitation.

From the report: “AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentification of never-before-seen experimental and operational space, rocket, and air systems, including stealth technologies and the proliferation of drone platforms.”

Dr. Kirkpatrick has also issued stern warnings to members of Congress not to use the search for E.T. as an excuse to expose top-secret weapons. From his recent opinion piece published in Scientific American (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-need-to-investigate-ufos-but-without-the-distraction-of-conspiracy/): “There also is the possibility that some observed and reported phenomena are associated with past or ongoing national security programs completely unrelated to extraterrestrials. Unfortunately, some who have been peripherally involved in these programs are taking advantage of the lack of understanding of security compartmentalization among the public—and some members of Congress—and feel that exposure of national security activities is a public right.

The harm of such exposure would be incalculable: billions of dollars and decades invested in military capabilities exposed to our potential adversaries to satisfy ill-informed curiosity. While some staffers and members of Congress may claim that they and the American people have a right to know of every classified research program, Congress already has an established process for notification of sensitive programs to the bipartisan leadership of both the Senate and House as well as the chairs and ranking minority members of the Senate and House intelligence committees, often referred to as the Gang of Eight. It is incumbent on both the speaker of the House, the Senate majority leader and both chairs of the intelligence committees to ensure that there is no risk of exposing any national security programs in a rush to find extraterrestrials, and that documents are reviewed within appropriate channels. If these members of Congress deem it appropriate not to share classified information, they are doing their job. These are not town hall topics.”

Notice that he says “billions of dollars and decades invested in military capabilities … ”

So, herein lies the true nature of the entire UFO saga in this country going all the way back to 1947: Learning the truth about UFOs would mean revealing the existence of top-secret weapons.

Logically, then, this would suggest that a whole bizarre inventory of encounters involving U.S. military personnel have always been top-secret Pentagon technologies known only to a small circle with a “need to know.” Everything from those UFOs that disabled nuclear missile launch systems back in the 1960s, to the Tic Tac encounters with U.S. Navy pilots in 2004.

Moreover, the performance characteristics of these objects were such that there is one clear, overarching likelihood suggested by this historical record of sightings: The Pentagon has developed exotic and highly unconventional propulsion systems that it has hidden from the public all these years.

This “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs leads to many follow-up questions and concerns, chief among them: Is there a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force that is far more capable than either of those entities? If so, how far have we gone? Do we have military bases in deep space?  Are any of these top-secret platforms nuclear-powered?

Thanks to Rep. Burchett and his colleagues for their efforts and Fox News Digital for the interview.

After Another Classified UFO Briefing, Congressman Says There’s a Coverup, And I Agree, But It Has Nothing To Do With Space Aliens

I see there was another one of those classified UFO briefings for members of Congress on Wednesday, April 17, 2024.

Hardly any media covered it. Here is an article in The Hill.

Rep. Tim Burchett on UFOs: ‘Yeah, I think there’s a cover up’

This snippet from The Hill article is most relevant, in brackets and bolded:

[Following a classified briefing on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), more commonly known as UFOs, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) suggested Wednesday that the U.S. government may be intentionally concealing information on these objects from the American public.

“I think there’s a cover up,” Burchett told Blake Burman on NewsNation’s “The Hill.”]

I wholeheartedly agree with Rep. Burchett: There is a HUGE coverup.

However, it has absolutely nothing to do with E.T. and everything to do with Pentagon secrecy about propulsion breakthroughs going back decades. All the evidence I’ve seen strongly suggests the UFOs are top-secret U.S. weapons, particularly the most sensational ones like the Tic Tac encountered by U.S. Navy pilots in 2004 over a U.S. military training range.

The Pentagon’s recent UFO report pretty much confirms as much, explicitly spelling out that UFO witnesses have unwittingly observed top-secret weapons and that they misidentified these technologies as extraterrestrial. The report also makes clear that public discussion of these programs would seriously damage national security.

Here are some excerpts from the UFO report that demonstrate these facts, bulleted, bolded and in brackets:

[• AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentification of never-before-seen experimental and operational space, rocket, and air systems, including stealth technologies and the proliferation of drone platforms.

• AARO concludes many of these programs represent authentic, current and former sensitive, national security programs, but none of these programs have been involved with capturing, recovering, or reverse-engineering off-world technology or material.

• In many cases, the interviewees named authentic USG (U.S. government) classified programs well-known and understood to those appropriately accessed to them in the Executive Branch and Legislative Branch; however, the interviewees mistakenly associated these authentic USG programs with alien and extraterrestrial activity. 

• AARO assesses that all of the named and described alleged hidden UAP reverse-engineering programs provided by interviewees either do not exist; are misidentified authentic, highly-sensitive national security programs that are not related to extraterrestrial technology exploitation

• The interviewees and others who have mistakenly associated authentic sensitive national security programs with UAP had incomplete or unauthorized access to these programs; discussion of these programs outside of secure facilities presents a high risk of exposing national security information.]

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, former head of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), has also reinforced these assertions in two opinion pieces published in Scientific American.

Here is an excerpt from one of his Op/Eds, bold and in brackets, and also here is a link to one of the pieces: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-need-to-investigate-ufos-but-without-the-distraction-of-conspiracy/

[There also is the possibility that some observed and reported phenomena are associated with past or ongoing national security programs completely unrelated to extraterrestrials. Unfortunately, some who have been peripherally involved in these programs are taking advantage of the lack of understanding of security compartmentalization among the public—and some members of Congress—and feel that exposure of national security activities is a public right.

The harm of such exposure would be incalculable: billions of dollars and decades invested in military capabilities exposed to our potential adversaries to satisfy ill-informed curiosity. While some staffers and members of Congress may claim that they and the American people have a right to know of every classified research program, Congress already has an established process for notification of sensitive programs to the bipartisan leadership of both the Senate and House as well as the chairs and ranking minority members of the Senate and House intelligence committees, often referred to as the Gang of Eight. It is incumbent on both the speaker of the House, the Senate majority leader and both chairs of the intelligence committees to ensure that there is no risk of exposing any national security programs in a rush to find extraterrestrials, and that documents are reviewed within appropriate channels. If these members of Congress deem it appropriate not to share classified information, they are doing their job. These are not town hall topics.]

It’s worth noting that there is plenty of precedent for quantum leaps in military technology going all the way back to the ancient Sumerians and Greeks, astonishing breakthroughs held in extreme secrecy for decades.

There is, however, NO precedent for E.T. visitation.

I would argue that when you consider the historical pattern of UFO encounters beginning  in 1947 that the U.S. has had some form of electric or electromagnetic field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since then. If this is true, then these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s “black budget,” keeping them hidden from the public.

I would further propose that if this is true, then it is the most profound military conspiracy in history, far surpassing everything from the Trojan Horse to the Manhattan Project. A secret of such magnitude that if revealed would have huge implications not only for the world economy but for the very trajectory of human civilization.

So, I would submit that if you remove E.T. visitation from the equation, the only logical explanation is that the Pentagon has very likely developed a series of propulsion breakthroughs that have been responsible for, but not limited to:

• Kenneth Arnold’s seminal sighting in 1947

• The UFOs over Washington, D.C., in 1952

•  The UFO that crashed in Kecksburg, Pennsylvania, in 1965

• The giant triangular UFO seen over the Hudson Valley and Belgium in the 1980s

•  The giant triangular object over Phoenix, Arizona, in 1997

•  The similarly giant triangular or delta-shape object observed over southern Illinois in 2000

• The Tic Tac-shape object encountered by U.S. Navy pilots in 2004

•  The disc-shape object observed over Chicago O’Hare International Airport in 2006

As to why the Pentagon would be operating these weapons over populated areas, perhaps it’s real-world training, a “living lab” to perfect tactics and to study how well they perform against state-of-the-art, white-world technologies like F-16s. There have been examples of mysterious military training exercises taking place over populated areas. This excellent article in The War Zone documents one such exercise over Los Angeles (https://www.twz.com/38753/those-mysterious-gray-helicopters-were-landing-on-multiple-downtown-la-rooftops-last-night).

So, if this terrestrial hypothesis for UFOs is correct and the Pentagon has made a series of astonishing propulsion breakthroughs –  something akin to antigravity – then this raises a whole host of follow-up concerns and questions. For example, do we have a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force? If so, do we have military bases in deep space?

Thanks to Rep. Burchett and his colleagues for pursuing this matter. Thanks to The Hill for covering the briefing.

But it’s still not E.T.

It was never E.T.

Fascinating Study Shows that UFOs Responded to Encrypted Radio Signals, Suggesting These Were U.S. Military Weapons

This is a fascinating study prepared by the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies.

https://www.wkrg.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/698743073/scientific-coalition-for-uap-studies-publishes-pattern-study-1945-1975-military-and-public-activities

Two major takeaways are the cluster of UFO activities around sensitive U.S. nuclear facilities and the fact that during mysterious UFO encounters in 1957, a UFO responded to encrypted radio signals.

Whereas the study’s authors conclude the UFOs must have been extraterrestrial because of their incredible performance characteristics, I would suggest a different, perhaps equally crazy interpretation.

In the case of the encounters at nuclear facilities, you have to ask yourself: Who would have had the most interest in both U.S. nukes and the disabling of nuclear weapons in the event of a dire confrontation with the Soviets?

Answer: the U.S.

I propose that some of these encounters represent the testing of advanced anti-missile systems developed by the Pentagon to temporarily incapacitate the missile-launch apparatus by bombarding these weapons with electromagnetic-pulse energy. By testing such a system on our own nukes, we would have gathered critical data showing how well such a system would work on Soviet nukes.

We have electromagnetic pulse technologies now that disable electronic systems. The military is sometimes decades ahead of the private sector in certain sensitive applications. It seems obvious that the Pentagon was testing some sort of system during the heyday of the Cold War, while the U.S. was locked in a desperate struggle for technological superiority over the Soviets.

Incidentally, the Pentagon’s recently released historical UFO study specifically says many UFO reports were misidentifications of top-secret U.S. weapons. Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, former director of the Pentagon’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), has reinforced this message in two commentaries in Scientific American. He also, very interestingly, warned Congress that investigating UFOs was not an excuse to reveal the existence of top-secret weapons, proclaiming, “These are not town hall topics.”

So, yeah, there’s a huge UFO coverup in this country, but it has nothing to do with extraterrestrials and everything to do with top-secret U.S. weapons.

We know the Cold War injected a powerful catalyst into the development of new top-secret weapons, particularly during the two decades following the end of World War II, and, presumably, some of these weapons remain hidden from the public to this day. 

Secondly, the fact that UFOs responded to the U.S. military’s coded radio transmissions suggests that these UFOs were U.S. military weapons.

Are we to believe that space aliens travel trillions of miles from another solar system, only to hang out over U.S. military installations, inscrutably responding to coded transponder transmissions? Isn’t it far more logical that these were U.S. weapons, the existence of which was known only to a small group of military personnel with the proper security clearances?

My simple rule of thumb is that if you encounter something ON this planet, then it was probably something OF this planet.

Because these encounters occurred so long ago, in my opinion, these documented episodes suggest that the Pentagon not only has top-secret propulsion systems unknown to the public and most military personnel, but that these systems have steadily evolved over the decades. This is why we have U.S. Navy aviators encountering things like the Tic Tac over U.S. military training ranges.

Also, I would further suggest that these encounters are NOT the testing of “experimental” aircraft, but the actual training of operational weapons. That is why, for example, the Tic Tac encounters took place over a training range. This would clearly suggest that U.S. personnel are training in the use of these super-advanced, super-secret weapons.

So, in other words, investigative efforts aimed at finding space aliens initiated by the late, great Sen. Harry Reid have ironically exposed top-secret U.S. weapons, not extraterrestrials on Earth.

As insane as this sounds, it’s no crazier than the dominant E.T. hypothesis, which proposes that space aliens possessing the awesome scientific and engineering sophistication needed to travel from one solar system to another are then unable to land without crashing. Now, does that make any sense? This is cheesy 1950s scifi (think, It Came from Outer Space). This is not reality.

Unfortunately, the entire field of “ufology” has been dominated by people who have already bought into the E.T. hypothesis.

I would argue that if you are already convinced that it’s E.T., you’re never going to learn the truth. People need to stop gazing toward the stars and start asking what the Pentagon has been up to all these years.

And, by the way, although this study by the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies seems to suggest that other nations are experiencing the same frequency of UFO encounters that we’re seeing in the United States, particularly among the military, there is scant evidence of this.

Where are the data to support this claim? Where are the first-person accounts of recent encounters among foreign military branches?

I know of at least one major foreign power that has officially documented NO major UFO sightings over the past decade: Australia.

Here is a link to the official report: https://www.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-08/defence_foi_845_22_23_-_document.pdf

Here is a link to an article in Outkick that discusses the report: https://www.outkick.com/culture/australia-government-ufo-report

All the evidence I’ve seen suggests that it’s happening here a lot more often than it’s happening anywhere else in the world. The last time we had a big UFO flap in Europe was the giant triangular craft over Belgium in 1989-1990, which I contend was the U.S. military running a training mission. And, by all appearances, the mission went very well, what with the UFOs flying rings around state-of-the-art fighter jets over the NATO capital. 

But there have been no relatively recent encounters within the various foreign military branches that even remotely compare to the experiences of U.S. Navy pilots, for example.

Now, why would that be?

Anyway, here is an excerpt from the study conducted by the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies. Incidentally, the report mentions that readings were taken using “an air defense radar station outside Las Vegas, Nevada (Mount Lemmon)” but isn’t Mount Lemmon in Tucson, Ariz.? That would be WAY outside of Vegas:

[From July 16 to July 18, 1957, an air defense radar station outside Las Vegas, Nevada (Mount Lemmon) tracked an extremely high-speed unidentified target (estimated at 6,200 mph) for a very short time before it became stationary. The UAP remained airborne and stationary for over 32 minutes, apparently hovering at 42,000 feet altitude. The target then departed at a similar and possibly faster speed, until it disappeared beyond radar range. During the time the search radar acquired the target, it appeared to respond to an encrypted military IFF transponder signal. The UAP was sent a command to identify itself from the air defense site. In turn, the UAP sent back coded elements of an appropriate IFF response. A similar incident had been reported two days earlier by the same crew at the radar site; the incidents of those two days were unique, with no similar report either before or afterward. Analysis of the event – The object was tracked at 6,200 mph. For reference, at that time, the fastest plane was the Fairey Delta 2 at 1,132 mph (Royal Air Force). The UAP then became stationary for over 32 min and transmitted a IFF signal. Combining both the incredible speed and ability to stop and stay stationary strongly suggests this was not an aircraft available at the time, either friend or adversary.]

Many thanks to the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies!

But it’s still not E.T.

It was never E.T.