Month: August 2023

Commentary in socialist publication @jacobin nails the UFO issue cold: Just because they aren’t extraterrestrial doesn’t mean there’s nothing to see here … genius!

Ok, so, this is possibly a first! Someone in the media has finally addressed the two most important aspects of the whole UFO conundrum that’s been confounding America:

Point number one is, just because the UFOs aren’t extraterrestrial, that doesn’t mean there’s nothing to see here.

Secondly, David Grusch evidently was fed industrial-strength disinformation to cover up something. So, exactly what was the nature of this disinformation?

https://jacobin.com/2023/08/ufos-aliens-government-secrets-whistleblowers-transparency

Also, I’ll add a third point of my own: What is that “something” the Pentagon is going to such great lengths to cover up? Could that something be a top-secret breakthrough in propulsion technology – developed with tax dollars – a quantum leap that if commercialized would greatly benefit society?

You know my opinion, that the UFOs have never been ET. They have always been Uncle Sam. They were Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when, I speculate, President Harry Truman ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after unknowingly observing flights of the top secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a top-secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shoot straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters recently described by U.S. Navy pilots.

It certainly appears that based on witness testimony the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. Call it antigravity, if you like. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since that time. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark, nurtured by the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget,” hidden from Congress and the executive branch, for longer than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like whistleblower David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about now? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a HUGE technological breakthrough in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to alter the trajectory of the human race by ushering in a radical new means of transportation and enabling the practical colonization of space? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Ex-military pilots including @wardcarroll say UFOs could be products of Pentagon ‘black budget’  

Interesting, albeit very brief, article in Britain’s Daily Star newspaper quoting ex-military pilots Ward ‘Mooch’ Carroll and Brian ‘Sunshine’ Sinclair speculating that some of the more sensational UFOs could be top secret U.S. platforms developed within the Pentagon’s black budget, which would conceal these programs from Congress.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird-news/fighter-jet-pilots-say-pentagon-30776191

It appears that people are finally starting to realize that the Pentagon has probably developed an advanced propulsion technology and that the UFOs are likely terrestrial.

So, along those lines, if, for example, the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots isn’t ET. Then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics, perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” being investigated by physicists, which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces caused by traditional chemical propulsion systems.

U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has recently made some VERY intriguing comments that appear to support the idea that some of the UFOs encountered by Navy pilots could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated entirely in the dark without oversight from Congress.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

Information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a “need to know” only, Gillibrand said. She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding current secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project, suggesting potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, fearing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions that said including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So, there is a lot of fear. So, I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”

Without some clarity, it’s impossible to know exactly what Sen. Gillibrand is saying, but she seems to be alluding to a conflict between Congress and the Pentagon, with the Pentagon apparently restricting access to information that is directly related to UFO sightings.

You know my opinion: It was never ET. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier, in the 1960s when startled pilots were filing UFO reports after observing overflights of the top secret U-2 and SR-71, and it is today as well. Based on witness testimony, the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough – call it antigravity, if you like. However, officials can’t admit that it has antigravity because, well, then it would no longer be secret. It all makes perfect sense, in a convoluted kind of way.

I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to Arnold’s seminal sighting that the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since then. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving steadily and entirely in the dark for the past 75 years.

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just making money off the ET hypothesis.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like whistleblower David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective. And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to alter the trajectory of the human race? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

Anyway, if the Pentagon does, indeed, have antigravity, this raises a whole host of follow-up concerns and questions, including:

  • Do we have a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force? If so, do we have military bases in deep space?
  • When the SR-71 blackbird was retired in 1990, was it replaced by another, more advanced platform capable of reaching any destination in the world quickly and on short notice, or was it simply superseded by satellites and drones, as is conventional wisdom?
  • In addition to antigravity, have we developed a propulsion system that harnesses the Casimir effect? This might explain the incredible performance observed by police officers in southern Illinois in 2000. At least one of the officers said the ship darted from place to place inexplicably in the blink of an eye.
  • If we have developed such a propulsion system, have we gone interstellar?     

At any rate, I contend these advanced aerospace platforms are well beyond the test phase but are fully operational. This might explain why some of the encounters have happened over U.S. military training ranges.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

@johnlennon saw a flying saucer on this day in history, Aug. 23, and it was probably just Uncle Sam spying on him

On this day in history, Aug. 23, 1974, John Lennon and his girlfriend saw a classic flying saucer near his New York apartment building, the United Nations and the East River.

(Here’s a little background article I found on ultimateclassicrock.com https://ultimateclassicrock.com/john-lennon-ufo/)

From the article:

“I was lying naked on my bed, when I had this urge,” Lennon said in a conversation with Andy Warhol’s Interview magazine. “So I went to the window, just dreaming around in my usual poetic frame of mind. … There, as I turned my head, hovering over the next building, no more than 100 feet away was this thing with ordinary electric light bulbs flashing on and off round the bottom, one non-blinking red light on top.”

His girlfriend, May Pang, said: “As I walked out onto the terrace, my eye caught this large, circular object coming towards us. It was shaped like a flattened cone, and on top was a large, brilliant red light, not pulsating as on any of the aircraft we’d see heading for a landing at Newark Airport.”

I propose this was likely just Uncle Sam, running electronic surveillance on Lennon, who was deemed a socialist threat, just as we spied on Martin Luther King Jr. and numerous public figures.

And this supposition fits nicely with my overall hypothesis that the UFOs have never been extraterrestrial. They’ve always been Uncle Sam. They were Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when, I speculate, President Harry Truman ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after observing flights of the top secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a top-secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a delta-shape craft inexplicably darting from place to place in the blink of an eye at low altitude; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shoot straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters described by U.S. Navy pilots.

So, it certainly appears that based on witness testimony the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. Call it antigravity, if you like. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since that time. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark for more than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like whistleblower David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to alter the trajectory of the human race by ushering in a radical new means of transportation and enabling the practical colonization of space? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

I agree with U.S. Rep. @JaredEMoskowitz, the public does have a right to know the truth about UFOs

It’s very interesting that at least some members of Congress haven’t bought into the whole extraterrestrial hypothesis that has dominated the national conversation about UFOs. Some are actually starting to figure out that all of this UFO business has nothing to do with ET and everything to do with “secret access programs” that are shielded from Congress, the executive branch and the public.

In this Daily Beast article, Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL), appears to suggest as much when he talks about hidden programs. 

“We can’t over-classify this stuff,” Moskowitz told The Daily Beast in an interview. “The American people have a right to know. They have a right to some level of disclosure.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/lawmakers-say-the-truth-is-out-there-on-ufosif-they-get-a-new-committee

He later goes on to say that perhaps Congress should look into the funding of secret programs that lack oversight and were alluded to in testimony by whistleblower David Grusch.

From the Daily Beast article:

Lawmakers say they were also left with questions about the use of tax dollars for UFOs after Grusch alleged Pentagon UFO programs are fueled by a “misappropriation of funds.”

“The funding issues that were brought up about how some of these projects are funded… I’d like to hear more about that,” Moskowitz said. “That’s the American taxpayer. That’s their money.”

You know my opinion: It was never ET. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when, I speculate, President Harry Truman ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after observing flights of the top secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a top-secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily shutting down the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when hundreds of people witnessed the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shoot straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters described by U.S. Navy pilots.

So, it certainly appears that based on witness testimony the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. Call it antigravity, if you like. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since that time. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark for more than 70 years and are well beyond the testing phase!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to alter the trajectory of the human race by ushering in a radical new means of transportation and enabling the practical colonization of space? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

@RepEricBurlison is so correct! The UFOs are likely ‘manmade’ …

It’s always refreshing when you read about a prominent, influential person who isn’t fully ensconced in the ridiculous ET hypothesis that dominates the whole national conversation about UFOs.

Burlison on UFO’s: ‘They’re either angels or man-made’

Here, we see a U.S. representative endorsing the terrestrial hypothesis, and thank goodness for that!

So, assuming the UFOs are of terrestrial making and taking that line of reasoning a step further, I would say the observational evidence supports the idea that the Pentagon has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. At this point, with absolutely NO direct evidence supporting the space-alien hypothesis, you have to at least ponder this possibility, especially when you consider the burgeoning military “black budget” year after year after year going back decades, shrouding various programs in complete secrecy, hidden from Congress, the executive branch, and the public.

So, if, for example, the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots on a U.S. military training range isn’t ET, then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics — perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” being investigated by physicists — which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces generated by traditional chemical propulsion systems. We might also speculate that some of the vehicles observed are possibly nuclear-powered platforms. Anyway, these vehicles appear to be well beyond the testing phase, but are actually in operation, which is perhaps why they are seen over military training ranges.

Also recently, U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has made some VERY intriguing comments that appear to suggest that some of the UFOs encountered by Navy pilots could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated entirely without congressional oversight.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

Information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a “need to know” only, Gillibrand said.  She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding current secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project. The senator appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, fearing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

(Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions that said including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So, there is a lot of fear. So, I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”)

You know my opinion: It was never ET. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in the 1960s when pilots were reporting UFOs after seeing flights of the U-2 and SR-71, and it is today as well. Based on witness testimony, the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. Call it antigravity, if you like. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to Kenneth Arnold’s seminal sighting in 1947 that the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation at least since then. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark for more than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Ion Drive Drone: Is the private sector slowly catching up to the Pentagon?

I read with interest this squib about some startup in Florida creating an ion-drive drone.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12412667/Is-Tic-Tac-UFO-pilots-seeing-Advanced-drones-fly-silently-without-signs-propulsion-mystery-sightings-experts-say.html

Now, don’t you think the Pentagon is light years ahead of anything the private sector is doing?

I say yes, especially when you consider the burgeoning military “black budget” year after year after year going back decades, shrouding various programs in complete secrecy, hidden from Congress, the executive branch, and the public.

Chances are, the Pentagon has something a lot more advanced than this dinky little ion drive.

Chances are, the Pentagon has antigravity propulsion!

So, along those lines, if, for example, the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots on a U.S. military training range isn’t ET, then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics, perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” being investigated by physicists, which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces caused by traditional chemical propulsion systems.

And ten-to-one it’s a nuclear-powered platform, possibly a compact fission reactor capable of producing megavolts! These vehicles would be far beyond the testing phase. They would be in operation, and that’s perhaps why they are seen over training ranges.

Recently, U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has made some VERY intriguing comments that appear to support the idea that some of the UFOs encountered by Navy pilots could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated entirely without congressional oversight.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

Information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a “need to know” only, which excludes Congress and the public.  She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding current secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project. Gillibrand appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, fearing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

You know my opinion: It was never ET. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in the 1960s when pilots were reporting UFOs after seeing flights of the U-2 and SR-71, and it is today as well. Based on witness testimony, the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to Kenneth Arnold’s seminal sighting in 1947 that the U.S. has had some form of antigravity or field propulsion technology either in development or in operation at least since then. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving for more than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Washington Post’s UFO article is right about one thing: Supporting the ET hypothesis is great for ratings, not for reporting actual facts

Ok, so I savored with great relish a most rare sight within the hallowed pages of the Washington Post: a story about UFOs!

And the article reveals a sad truth: It is very profitable for news organs to endorse the ET hypothesis, regardless of the facts.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/08/18/newsnation-ufo-david-grusch-intercept-coulthart/

However, the Post is missing a couple of HUGE issues related to this whole strange UFO saga.

David Grusch was obviously fed some serious, industrial-strength disinformation from colleagues within the Pentagon. The purpose was to make him think the UFOs are extraterrestrial. To accomplish this goal, the disinformation must have been pretty convincing and sophisticated, including fake data, bogus documents, etc.

So, why the disinformation?

The main purpose of disinformation is to hide something. I contend that something is a propulsion breakthrough at the Pentagon, a quantum leap that might easily be mistaken for something out of this world. A monumental advance conjured up entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!

So, along those lines, if, for example, the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots isn’t ET, then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics, perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” being investigated by physicists, which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces generated by traditional chemical propulsion systems. We are talking instantaneous acceleration!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just making money off the ET hypothesis.

So, instead of asking whether the Pentagon has developed new propulsion tech that would literally change the trajectory of human civilization if commercialized, we’re all asking whimsical questions about ET, time travel, interdimensional beings and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

Anyway, In support of the “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs, I offer some intriguing but admittedly vague comments by U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., who seems to be suggesting that some of the UFOs could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated without the knowledge of Congress or the executive branch.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

Information about these weapons, she suggests, could be restricted to those with a “need to know” only.  She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb. Gillibrand appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, fearing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions that said including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So, there is a lot of fear. So, I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”

Anyway, I’m very gratified that the Washington Post has deigned to write about UFOs, but disappointed that journalists have forgotten how to ask questions.

Here’s one to start with: Why was David Grusch fed disinformation, and from whom?

Also, it would be great if some news organization could succeed in getting some clarity from Sen. Gillibrand about her recent comments regarding UFOs. She is a U.S. senator, after all!

Speaking about UFOs, Sen. Gillibrand invokes Manhattan Project to describe secrecy surrounding Pentagon programs, citing ‘under penalty of death’ language in non-disclosure agreements

Ok, so, in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand seems to suggest that some of the UFOs encountered by U.S. Navy pilots could be top secret Pentagon weapons that Congress hasn’t been “read in on.” As such, she said, information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a “need to know” only, which excludes Congress and the public.  

https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html

She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding “secret access programs” to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb. Gillibrand appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may literally be afraid to come forward, fearing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Anyway, here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions … including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So there is a lot of fear. So I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”

Sen. Gillibrand seems to be alluding to a conflict between Congress and the Pentagon, with the Pentagon restricting access to information that is directly related to UFO sightings.

You know my opinion: It was never ET. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in the 1960s when pilots were reporting flights of the U-2 and SR-71 as UFOs, and it is today as well. Based on witness testimony, the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough – call it antigravity, if you like – which is unknown to Congress and to the executive branch. However, the Pentagon can’t admit that it has antigravity because, well, then it would no longer be secret. It all makes perfect sense, in a convoluted kind of way.

 But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Re: UFOs and secret Pentagon programs: ‘We do not want to be misled. We do not want to be led astray.’

In the following response to a reporter’s inquiry, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand uses some VERY interesting language regarding Congress’s quest for the truth about UFOs.

Here is the brief exchange published Aug. 8 in City & State New York, which covers New York politics and policy. (The full article is here: https://www.cityandstateny.com/personality/2023/08/kirsten-gillibrand-wants-know-truth-about-aliens/389198/)

Reporter: I understand you helped secure full funding for AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) this year, but do you feel like the U.S. is doing enough to research and review unidentified anomalous phenomena incidents?

Sen. Gillibrand: I think this AARO office is excellent and built to do this job. If there are special access programs – they are called SAP programs – that Congress was not read in on, we put an amendment in the defense bill to say they can’t be funded. We do not want to be misled. We do not want to be led astray. We want to get to the bottom of this and this office is perfectly positioned to do that work.

Well, alright, the senator’s a player!

It stands to reason that she wouldn’t have said “We do not want to be misled …” unless she thought there was at least a possibility that Congress was being misled and led astray. It also would appear that members of Congress are FINALLY coming to terms with the fact that the Pentagon is not telling the whole truth about UFOs and that some of these objects are likely top secret U.S. military weapons that are unknown to the public.

You know my opinion: It has always been the Pentagon, it has never been extraterrestrials. 

Here, in a recent opinion piece appearing in The Hill, the writer has hit on a HUGE issue.

From the piece: “Either the U.S. government has mounted an extraordinary, decades-long coverup of UFO retrieval and reverse-engineering activities, or elements of the defense and intelligence establishment are engaging in a staggeringly brazen psychological disinformation campaign.”

A monumental UFO scandal is looming

I vote “staggeringly brazen psychological disinformation campaign.”

The main purpose of disinformation is to hide something. I contend that something is a series of propulsion breakthroughs that, if commercialized, would literally change the trajectory of human civilization. These are advances conjured up entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!

So, along those lines, if the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots isn’t ET, then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics, perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” being investigated by physicists, which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces caused by traditional chemical propulsion systems. We are talking instantaneous acceleration.

I also contend that the U.S. has had some form of antigravity or field propulsion technology either in development or in operation going all the way back to the immediate postwar period and that these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget.” As such, the existence of these systems is hidden from Congress, the executive branch and the public.

Perhaps the last president to have direct knowledge was Ike, but I digress …

Meanwhile, a decades-long disinformation campaign has been engineered to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like David Grusch. Because, after all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think the Pentagon’s disinformation machinery is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we talking about? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to usher in a radical new means of transportation and enable the practical colonization of space? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘Are we alone?’ scenarios.

No one suspects that it’s all been engineered to be that way.

Do you think Mr. Grusch just woke up one day and said, oh, I know, it’s ET?

No, he was fed a diet of high-octane, professional-grade disinformation, likely with fake documents and fake data. Whatever it was, it was good enough to impress Grusch, who is no doubt a very intelligent, very educated person.

And it all fits nicely into a legacy of UFO disinformation going all the way back to 1952, when, I contend, President Truman arranged for a flyover of the experimental antigravity vehicles, much as he had ordered a similar demonstration of the flying wing aircraft, which flew over the White House in 1949.

After the 1952 UFO flap, generals quelled public concerns during a press conference, declaring that an atmospheric phenomenon called a “temperature inversion” caused radar blips mistaken for UFOs. Unfortunately, these objects also were observed visually. At any rate, it was a sham, but the media ate it up, setting the stage for what would follow: a seventy-year-long disinformation conspiracy surrounding UFOs.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Wait, so, the Vatican doesn’t know about ET crashes? What a surprise …

Ok, so this just in … the Vatican doesn’t know about ET, contrary to popular conspiracy theories.

UFOs and Aliens at the Vatican

You might recall reading about sensational claims that the Vatican was allegedly aware of a crashed extraterrestrial spacecraft sometime during the 1930s … an idea that has been voiced recently by whistleblower David Grusch.

https://www.newsweek.com/vatican-pressure-archives-ufo-cover-david-grusch-1816908

Incidentally, have any members of our esteemed fourth estate tried to speak with the Vatican to confirm this claim?

Evidently not.

There is also no evidence that the media have polled foreign military branches to learn whether they are experiencing the same epidemic of UFO encounters as U.S. Navy pilots.

Learning this detail might teach us something about the nature of these encounters, I mean, if the media really did want to find out what’s going on. But maybe it’s just a lot easier and more profitable to keep the whole ET myth alive.

Just saying …