Month: September 2023

About Spielberg’s ‘Encounters’ UFO Documentary, I Propose ‘Big Black Delta’ is One of Ours

So, I’ve been reading with alacrity all of the reviews of Spielberg’s new Netflix UFO documentary Encounters. One of the highlights is the giant delta-shaped object observed by multiple witnesses in Stephenville, Texas.

Here is one news article, published by the New York Post:

https://nypost.com/2023/09/28/spielberg-produced-ufo-doc-has-more-than-300-witnesses-for-spaceship/

Anyway, I propose this object is a top-secret U.S. military weapon. The same craft has been observed during various other encounters over the past three decades.

My hypothesis is that Big Black Delta is among a group of antigravity platforms that also includes the Tic Tac vehicle observed in 2004 by U.S. Navy pilots – advanced-propulsion weapons that have been developed entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!

According to this “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs, the evolution of these vehicles began during the immediate postwar period and they have been kept under wraps since that time, all the while becoming more and more sophisticated and shrouded entirely from Congress, the executive branch and the public. This supposition presumes that none of the UFOs are extraterrestrial and that the entire space-alien hypothesis is just a myth fed by popular culture and the Pentagon’s disinformation apparatus.

As to why the Pentagon would be flying these weapons over populated areas, perhaps it’s real-world training, a “living lab” to perfect tactics and to study how well they perform against state-of-the-art, white-world technologies like F-16s. There are many examples of military training exercises taking place over populated areas. This article in The War Zone documents one such exercise over Los Angeles: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/38753/those-mysterious-gray-helicopters-were-landing-on-multiple-downtown-la-rooftops-last-night

Anyway, it’s as good a theory as space aliens traveling trillions of miles across the gulf of space to hang out over Stephenville, Texas.

Regarding Big Black Delta specifically, I dedicate many pages of my book Flying Saucers to this hypothetical platform.

There have been tantalizing clues that the Pentagon might be hiding the existence of such weapons under cover of national security. For example, U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has recently made some VERY intriguing comments that appear to support the idea that some of the UFOs encountered by Navy pilots could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated in the dark.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

In essence, Sen. Gillibrand said information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a need to know only.  She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb. The senator appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, citing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions that said including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So, there is a lot of fear.

So, I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”

Sen. Gillibrand seems to be alluding to a conflict between Congress and the Pentagon, with the Pentagon restricting access to information that is directly related to UFO sightings.

In my opinion, UFOs have never been about E.T. Based on witness testimony, it certainly appears that the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough – call it antigravity, if you like – which is unknown to Congress. However, the Pentagon can’t admit that it has antigravity because, well, then it would no longer be secret. It all makes perfect sense, in a convoluted kind of way.

I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to 1947, the U.S. has had some form of antigravity or field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since then. If this is true, then these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s “black budget,” keeping them hidden from the public.

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the intellectual morass of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. This is industrial-strength disinformation, good enough to convince technical experts like David Grusch. Then, once you start talking about E.T. crashes and dead aliens, interdimensional beings, time travelers, and the Vatican’s in on the whole secret, the public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just making money off the E.T. hypothesis.

So, if this terrestrial hypothesis is correct – and the Pentagon does, indeed, have antigravity, this raises a whole host of follow-up concerns and questions, including:

  • Do we have a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force? If so, do we have military bases in deep space?
  • When the SR-71 blackbird was retired in 1990, was it replaced with another, more advanced platform capable of reaching any destination in the world quickly and on short notice. Is Big Black Delta that platform?  
  • In addition to antigravity, have we developed a propulsion system that harnesses the Casimir effect? This might explain the incredible performance observed by police officers in southern Illinois in 2000. At least one of the officers said the ship darted from place to place, instantly leaping several miles at a time.
  • If we have, indeed, developed such a propulsion system, have we gone interstellar?    

Of course, in exploring the terrestrial hypothesis there are many additional potential questions you could pose.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already pondered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Is the Eglin Air Force Base ‘Orb’ UFO Encounter the First Big Test of AARO’s Alleged Transparency? And note to @RepTimBurchett – the Pentagon is Never Going to Tell You the Truth …

Alright, so, there’s been a dearth of coverage about this apparently significant UFO event, an encounter over the Gulf of Mexico with an aircraft from Eglin Air Force Base in Florida sometime earlier this year. As I say, coverage has been sparse, and there has been virtually nothing in the big media. Here is an article posted recently by a publication called Liberation Times.

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/us-air-force-reports-mysterious-gulf-of-mexico-incident-to-pentagons-ufo-office

Actually, we don’t even have a date for this encounter. All we know is that it occurred “several months” before news of the encounter spilled out during a congressional hearing on UFOs in July 2023.

As I say, there has been almost NO coverage of this encounter, but according to Rep. Matt Gaetz, who received a classified briefing on it, a U.S. Air Force pilot saw a diamond-shape formation of UFOs over the Gulf of Mexico. The plane’s radar and camera systems failed as it approached the formation, but the pilot still managed to take a photo.

Gaetz, who evidently viewed this photo, described the object as an otherworldly “orb.”

Anyway, the most recent development, according to Liberation Times, is that the Department of Defense has acknowledged that an official report was filed with the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office and that AARO could release the report after it is approved.

So, we’ve heard a lot about the Pentagon’s newfound UFO “transparency” … let’s see if it proves true. Let’s see if AARO issues the report, complete with the photo the pilot took of this orb thing.

However, I wouldn’t get my hopes up, considering the long legacy of Pentagon UFO obfuscation.

What I would expect, based on this legacy, is that officials will take months to approve the report, knowing that people generally lose interest over time. Then, they will issue a heavily redacted thing, omitting the photo due to “national security” concerns.

I hope to be proven wrong. I really do! Maybe there will be a full report and the entire thing turns out to be something completely mundane – a balloon – and the malfunctioning sensors are totally explained as just an ordinary technological glitch.

Meanwhile, in other UFO news, Rep. Tim Burchett noted that NASA officials told the House Oversight Committee that the space agency’s UFO investigations wouldn’t deal at all with classified information. His comments are included in this Newsweek article – as I say, none of the big media are covering this stuff.

https://www.newsweek.com/congressman-shares-very-elusive-nasa-remarks-ufo-meeting-1829025

I found this segment (bolded font) from the Newsweek article to be particularly enlightening:

“My colleague [Alabama Representative] Gary Palmer asked about classified stuff at NASA, and they said, ‘We don’t have anything classified,'” Burchett said regarding the meeting.

According to the congressman’s video, when pressed further about the issue of classified information, the representatives from NASA gave a “very elusive” response.

“And so, what I think they’ve done is, they sent these two folks in here, like the Pentagon did, that have very little knowledge of the issue,” Burchett continued. “So they can say they can hold up their hand before Congress and swear that they know nothing about the issue, and it doesn’t exist.”

Burchett said that he also pressed the NASA representatives about the testimonies that came out during July’s hearing, as well as videos of UAP that have been declassified and shared with the public.

“So anyway, didn’t get a lot from that, and I’m a little disappointed,” the congressman concluded.

“We’re probably going to have to get some more people from the Pentagon in there to tell us what exactly is going on.”

“I just want the truth,” he added. “Give me the facts.”

In my opinion, since NASA UFO investigations won’t deal with classified information, we won’t learn anything of great substance from the agency on the subject. This is because all of the most sensational encounters, such as the infamous Tic Tac in 2004, likely involve top-secret U.S. military platforms, not E.T.

While I admire members of Congress for their dogged pursuit of the truth, I question their unflinching allegiance to the ET hypothesis (i.e., it’s space aliens). I think the reason the Pentagon isn’t telling the truth about UFOs is because it simply cannot tell the truth about UFOs without revealing the existence of top-secret weapons.

So, yeah, there’s definitely a big UFO coverup, but it has nothing to do with space aliens and everything to do with propulsion breakthroughs at the Pentagon over the past seven decades, advances that have been entirely shrouded from Congress because they are funded through the Defense Department’s “black budget.”  I propose that there has been a quantum leap in propulsion technology, conjured up entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!

So, we might call this supposition the terrestrial hypothesis, which presumes that none of the UFOs is extraterrestrial and that the entire space-alien hypothesis is just a myth fed by popular culture and the Pentagon’s disinformation apparatus.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered at great length, sometimes over intoxicants and amid heated discussion, sometimes quietly and stone cold sober during those solitary pre-dawn hours of darkness.

It’s all in Flying Saucers!

What if NASA can’t tell the truth about UFOs because the UFOs are top-secret U.S. weapons, and that’s classified?

NASA’s big UFO report released Thursday (Sept. 14, 2023) only reinforces my feeling that the nation’s space agency can’t tell the truth about UFOs because the UFOs are the Pentagon’s, meaning they are classified and out of reach.

In short, NASA doesn’t have a “need to know.”

So, all we’re going to learn from NASA reports will be endless minutia about mundane things like drones, satellites, astronomical and atmospheric phenomena, rocket launches that are mistaken for E.T., and bla, bla, bla.

This is because none of the UFOs are extraterrestrial. So, NASA cannot find any E.T. causality.

Upon surveying the extensive, if one-dimensional, coverage about the NASA report and presser, I found a quote from NASA Administrator Bill Nelson to be especially pertinent: “The NASA independent study team did not find any evidence that UAP have an extraterrestrial origin, but we don’t know what these UAP are …”

Meanwhile, we obviously have someone at the Pentagon feeding disinformation to people like whistleblower David Grusch. The main purpose of disinformation is to hide something. I contend that “something” is a propulsion breakthrough that, if commercialized, promises to literally change the trajectory of human civilization. This is a monumental advance conjured up entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!

So, along those lines, if, for example, the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots isn’t E.T., then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics — perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” now being investigated by physicists — which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces caused by traditional chemical propulsion systems.

U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has recently made some VERY intriguing comments that appear to support the idea that some of the UFOs encountered by Navy pilots could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated entirely in the dark without the knowledge of Congress or the executive branch.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

In essence, Sen. Gillibrand said information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a need to know only, which would exclude Congress, and I presume, NASA.  She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb. The senator appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, citing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions that said including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So, there is a lot of fear.

So, I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”

Sen. Gillibrand seems to be alluding to a conflict between Congress and the Pentagon, with the Pentagon restricting access to information that is directly related to UFO sightings.

You know my opinion: It was never E.T. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when President Harry Truman likely ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after unwittingly observing flights of the top-secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shooting straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters recently described by U.S. Navy pilots.

Based on witness testimony, the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough – call it antigravity, if you like – which is unknown to Congress. However, the Pentagon can’t admit that it has antigravity because, well, then it would no longer be secret. It all makes perfect sense, in a convoluted kind of way.

I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to 1947 that the U.S. has had some form of antigravity or field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since then. If this is true, then these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s “black budget,” keeping them hidden from Congress, the executive branch and the public.

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the intellectual morass of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just making money off of the E.T. hypothesis.

So, if this alternative view is correct – let’s call it the terrestrial hypothesis – and the Pentagon does, indeed, have antigravity, this raises a whole host of follow-up concerns and questions, including:

  • Do we have a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force? If so, do we have military bases in deep space?
  • When the SR-71 blackbird was retired in 1990, was it replaced with another, more advanced platform capable of reaching any destination in the world quickly and on short notice, or was it simply superseded by satellites and UAVs, as is conventional wisdom?  
  • In addition to antigravity, have we developed a propulsion system that harnesses the Casimir effect? This might explain the incredible performance observed by police officers in southern Illinois in 2000. At least one of the officers said the ship darted from place to place, instantly leaping several miles at a time.
  • If we have developed such a propulsion system, have we gone interstellar?    

Of course, in exploring the terrestrial hypothesis there are many additional potential questions you could pose.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already pondered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

I agree with U.S. Rep. Burchett (@ReptimBurchett): There’s a UFO coverup, it just has nothing to do with space aliens …

Interesting little squib in The Hill about a smackdown from the intelligence community’s inspector general. In response to Rep. Tim Burchett’s request for information about claims made by whistleblower David Grusch, the inspector general said there is no relevant information to share.

GOP rep renews UFO ‘cover-up’ claim after Intel watchdog response

My own opinion is that the whole UFO conundrum has nothing to do with extraterrestrials. It’s all about covering up top-secret U.S. weapons, notably advanced propulsion systems unknown to the general public, Congress and the executive branch.

That’s why there’s no information to share. It’s not E.T., and the intelligence community certainly isn’t going to share information about classified “black projects” at the Pentagon.

Meanwhile, the sophisticated disinformation being fed to officials like Grusch is very effective in distraction and obfuscation because once you entangle the UFO issue within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens, the Vatican, and other such nonsense, you relegate the story to the fringe. People don’t ask about top secret Pentagon weapons; instead, they pose fanciful questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings and various ‘we are not alone’ scenarios. This, in turn, dissuades the mainstream media from inquiring further because the whole story becomes suspect.

I know it sounds crazy, but is it any crazier than E.T. coming here from another solar system just so they can hang out almost exclusively over U.S. military training ranges? We aren’t seeing this epidemic of UFO encounters with the foreign military branches. Now, why exactly is that?

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

This month in history: Betty and Barney Hill are allegedly abducted by space aliens, but was their tale pure fiction inspired by 1954 movie Killers from Space?

Interesting commentary in Slate about the alleged alien abduction of Betty and Barney Hill on Sept. 19, 1961.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/09/ufo-uap-encounters-betty-barney-hill.html

The piece discusses a book on the subject by Matthew Bowman, noting that the author believed “context is everything” with regards to the times in which the Hills were living; that what’s really important are the social and cultural mores, conventions and racial biases of the postwar era.

But isn’t this just like saying the actual alien abduction never really happened at all? Because, logically, if it did really happen, who cares about social context? I mean, you’re either alien-abducted, or you aren’t alien-abducted, right? Why would context, or anything else, matter at all?

And I must take issue with the opinion writer’s claim that the Hills’ account constitutes “the first truly credible story of an alien encounter …”

To this, I say, rubbish … Where’s the credibility? Where’s the actual concrete evidence?

Actually, I have often wondered whether the Hills, arguably the most important figures in the whole strange saga of alien abduction in this country, might have borrowed elements from the plot of the 1954 movie Killers from Space.

In the film, a very young Peter Graves plays a scientist involved in top-secret nuclear-weapons research. He is abducted by bug-eyed aliens who perform advanced surgery on him to repair his heart, which is damaged when the aliens induce his jet fighter to crash. 

Some details in the Hills’ story mirrored the plight of Graves’ character. Most notably, he had no memory of the abduction afterward, and only upon receiving an injection of truth serum did he recall the whole episode.

Interestingly, the Hills also had no memory of their abduction and only were able to recall the ordeal under hypnosis, perhaps a softer form of truth serum.

In both stories, Earthlings were exploited by strange-looking space aliens standing over them as they lay prostrate on an operating or exam table.

I also wonder whether the Pentagon’s UFO-disinformation machine might have later harnessed alien abduction as a vehicle to hide its work on advanced propulsion systems that have nothing to do with space aliens and everything to do with the burgeoning “black budget,” which shrouds such weapons development from Congress, the executive branch and the taxpaying public.

The purpose of this mendacity: to keep journalists from asking whether the Pentagon has achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that, if commercialized, promises to alter the trajectory of the human race by ushering in a radical new means of transportation. And it has worked brilliantly. After all, instead of inquiring about what exactly the Pentagon is up to, we are all consumed with whimsical reveries about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

You know my hypothesis, that the UFOs were never extraterrestrial, that they have always been advanced U.S. military weapons, going all the way back to Kenneth Arnold’s seminal sighting in 1947.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Great UFO analysis in The Washington Spectator, but, again, the writer misses a major point: Just because it isn’t E.T. doesn’t mean it isn’t something profoundly important

Excellent analysis piece in The Washington Spectator by writer Art Levine.

https:/I/washingtonspectator.org/ufo-tales-falling-apart-after-hearings/

Unfortunately, however, he fails to recognize two really important factors in the whole UFO saga:

  1. Just because the UFOs aren’t extraterrestrial, that doesn’t mean they aren’t something hugely important. That “something,” I contend, is a quantum leap in propulsion technology achieved not with the help of E.T. but entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us a long list of scientific and technological wonders over the centuries.  
  2. There’s a UFO disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. so that journalists like Art Levine won’t ask whether the Pentagon might be hiding a series of propulsion breakthroughs that, if commercialized, would literally alter the trajectory of human civilization by ushering in a radical new means of transportation. These are advances paid for entirely, by the way, with tax dollars.

Mr. Levine, like virtually every other journalist who has recently held forth on this subject, has failed to ask why whistleblower David Grusch and others are being fed disinformation, and exactly who is manufacturing and distributing said disinformation. Also, what is the nature of this disinformation? Is it documents, is it photographs? Learning these details could be very instructive.

Regardless, here is the bottom line: The UFOs have never been extraterrestrial. They have always been Uncle Sam. They were Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when President Harry Truman likely ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after unwittingly observing flights of the top-secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a top-secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shoot straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters recently described by U.S. Navy pilots.

I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, the Pentagon has had some form of field propulsion or antigravity technology either in development or in operation since that time. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark, nurtured by the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget,” hidden from Congress and the executive branch, for longer than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s E.T. or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about now? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a breakthrough in propulsion technology? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

Meanwhile, it is true that skeptical members of the media haven’t fallen for the whole E.T. hypothesis, but they have nevertheless been fooled by Pentagon disinformation: They correctly recognize that it isn’t E.T., but then they incorrectly fail to understand that there is still a huge story here.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t seriously considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Today’s UFO article in The Hill invokes famous 1947 ‘Twining memo’ but, importantly, why did the general suddenly stop talking about flying saucers?

This article appearing in today’s The Hill publication invokes the famous Twining memo, penned by Gen. Nathan Twining in 1947. In the memo, the general is quite specific about the performance characteristics of UFOs observed by military personnel.

The Pentagon’s UFO office is sending cryptic ‘alien’ messages

The Hill is correct to refer to this hugely important piece of UFO lore. However, I would argue, so-called ufologists have always focused on the memo for the wrong reasons.

Rather than referring to the document as evidence of extraterrestrial visitations, I think it points to an entirely different phenomenon: a top-secret U.S. military propulsion technology, a program so compartmentalized that it was unknown to Gen. Twining at the time.

Twining also said in the memo that “it was within U.S. knowledge” for American engineers to build a flying saucer. He was even specific enough to claim the saucers might have a range of seven thousand miles at subsonic speeds. Now, how would he know this unless these platforms were produced by Earthlings, not extraterrestrials?

Later, and very curiously, we never hear Twining talk about UFOs again. I think this is because he was let in on the secret when he was inducted into the Majestic Twelve group, which, I contend, was organized to keep this top-secret propulsion breakthrough under wraps.

It’s all in Chapter 9 of Flying Saucers!

Article in today’s @washingtonpost by reporter @terrence_mccoy: ‘In U.S., most UFO documentation is classified. Not so in other countries.’ Now, why might that be?

Here’s an interesting — and exceedingly rare — article about UFOs in the Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/09/06/ufo-brazil-documents-classified/

The bottom line is this: The United States is far more secretive about UFOs than are other countries.

Now, why might this be?

Hmmm … could it be that the United States is hiding something? Could that ‘something’ be that the United States is the source of said UFOs?

I say yes. I say the UFOs have never been extraterrestrial. They have always been Uncle Sam. They were Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when, I speculate, President Harry Truman ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after observing flights of the top secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a top-secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shoot straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters recently described by U.S. Navy pilots.

It certainly appears that based on witness testimony the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. Call it antigravity, if you like. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since that time. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark, nurtured by the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget,” hidden from Congress and the executive branch, for longer than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like whistleblower David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about now? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to alter the trajectory of the human race by ushering in a radical new means of transportation? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!