Author: emilvenere

Emil Venere is a writer with many years of experience, both at major research universities and daily newspapers. He holds a master's degree in journalism from the University of Arizona and a bachelor's in literature from Ramapo College of New Jersey. He wrote the science fiction novel Flying Saucers.

NY Post UFO article exposes media bias toward ET hypothesis but misses one important point

Interesting article about this nation’s bizarre and unfolding UFO crisis that describes both the media’s and the government’s ostensible bias toward the ET hypothesis.

https://nypost.com/2023/03/21/ufo-believing-pentagon-bosses-missed-spy-craft-for-years/

However, it fails to recognize a major feature in this strange and ongoing phenomenon. Yes, the Pentagon’s alleged quest for the truth about UFOs has been rooted in the improbable idea that the UFOs are extraterrestrial. But, equally as important, this is by design!

Ultimately, the Pentagon wants people to think it’s ET because then the media, and the public, won’t suspect that our military is operating above-top-secret weapons based on a different type of propulsion system and that this ability has existed for some time.

And, as if that weren’t crazy enough, you have the government’s official Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program unwittingly exposing these top-secret weapons because its principals were fully ensconced in the ET hypothesis.

The problem is that it’s not ET. It was never ET. The Pentagon just wants you to think it’s ET. That’s why you have the Pentagon collaborating on a research paper proposing that alien motherships are patrolling our solar system. It’s why you have top generals refusing to refute ridiculous speculation and rumors that unidentified balloons could be ET.

At the same time, we have members of Congress who don’t understand what’s going on. The military can’t reveal to Congress that these are top secret weapons because then, well, they wouldn’t be top secret.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already pondered … it’s all in Flying Saucers!

Spielberg is correct – just not for the right reason — when he says the government is lying about UFOs

Ok, so Steven Spielberg thinks the government is hiding information about UFOs.

https://nypost.com/2023/03/03/steven-spielberg-the-us-government-is-hiding-ufo-information/

Whoa, bravo Mr. Spielberg for that Eureka! moment!

Yes, the government, or, more specifically, the Pentagon, isn’t telling the whole truth about UFOs.

This is because the most sensational ones, the Tic Tacs, the flying discs, the triangles, etc., are above-top-secret U.S. weapons based on a different type of propulsion system, a so-called field propulsion technology.

Observations also would suggest some of these vehicles are using a nuclear power plant of some sort.

The reason they are seen predominantly over U.S. military training ranges, by U.S. military pilots, during U.S. military exercises, is because they themselves are U.S. military weapons.

Despite all the mythologizing, these aren’t ET. They were never ET.

The Pentagon just wants you to think they are so you won’t catch on.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Bloomberg Opinion Piece Hints at True Origins of UFOs

I was reading the Washington Post and ran across this interesting analysis piece from a Bloomberg writer.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/us-government-has-been-dancing-around-ufos-for-75-years/2023/02/22/7ce50280-b2c4-11ed-94a0-512954d75716_story.html

Here, the writer hints at the origins of UFOs. He adroitly assesses that the true, modern-day phenomenon began 75 years ago, with Kenneth Arnold’s seminal sighting.

Actually, it began during the final days of World War II, primarily over the European theater, with U.S. pilots spotting so-called foo fighters tagging along American aircraft.  

This would strongly suggest that there was a wartime propulsion breakthrough by one of the European powers. Call it field propulsion, if you like.

Subsequent sightings, largely over the United States (including Kenneth Arnold’s), would also strongly suggest that the U.S. military was in possession of this propulsion breakthrough.

Afterward, it continued to evolve over the decades, growing better and better but remaining entirely in the dark, hidden even from other military departments, unknown to all but the select few at the Pentagon with the proper clearances.

Meanwhile, the propulsion system was continually improved upon, fed by America’s enormous, ongoing and unrivaled military spending that followed the war. Much of this spending has been in the form of “black budgets” that are entirely shrouded from public scrutiny.

Now, U.S. Navy pilots are encountering vehicles capable of going from a hovering standstill to instantaneous acceleration and reaching unheard of hypersonic speeds. The reason we are seeing these vehicles primarily over U.S. military training ranges is because they are American.

It isn’t ET. It was never ET.

But I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already contemplated. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Why does the Pentagon want us to believe the UFOs are ET?


Well, if there’s any takeaway for the media after the incredible balloongate UFO fiasco, it is this: The Pentagon wants us all to believe the UFOs might be ET.

Let’s look at exhibit A, General Glen VanHerck, when asked a simple, direct question — whether they are ET — just couldn’t muster the strength to tell the truth.

https://time.com/6254959/military-ufo-shootdown-lake-huron/

“I’ll let the intel community and the counterintelligence community figure that out,” General Glen VanHerck, commander of U.S. Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) told reporters late Sunday.

Why would the Pentagon want the American public to falsely believe these particular UFOs are ET, even when it’s obvious they are balloons?

I have the answer!

It is because if we start realizing these most recent UFOs aren’t ET, we might also start to realize many, if not all, of the UFOs are not ET. Then, from that realization, we might further deduce that many of them are above-top-secret U.S. military weapons.

Above all, the Pentagon protects its secrets, and if that means confusing the public, even terrifying the public, then so be it.

I would take that line of reasoning even further and suggest to you that the Pentagon has a long history of doing this, to the point of running an organized, dedicated disinformation program aimed at promoting the ET hypothesis, when they know it’s bogus.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

As we ponder Einstein’s aloofness to the Washington flying saucers of 1952, was this bizarre event a deliberate demonstration ordered by Harry Truman?

There has been some online chatter lately about Albert Einstein’s odd memo regarding flying saucers over Washington, D.C., in 1952.

https://www.mentalfloss.com/posts/albert-einstein-ufo-letter

As the above article informs us, Einstein says in his missive, “Those people have seen something. What it is I do not know and am not curious to know.”

Einstein’s lack of curiosity pretty much sums up the smug aloofness of the scientific establishment toward the entire subject of UFOs going back decades. However, we must welcome any fleeting mainstream interest in this crucial event in the ongoing history of UFOs. It was, to be sure, an extraordinary affair in which UFOs buzzed the nation’s capital and eluded the best fighter jets of the time.

But were these UFOs of alien origin?

Instead, I propose that this was a deliberate demonstration ordered by President Harry Truman, and that the flying saucers were in fact advanced U.S. weapons under development since the end of World War II.

For those who are unfamiliar with this critically important happening in the canon of UFO lore, this article from the History Channel is a good backgrounder: https://www.history.com/news/ufos-washington-white-house-air-force-coverup

Anyway, as I was saying, my proposal is that the UFO flyovers were, in fact, demonstrations ordered by a skeptical president to prove the value of these platforms at a time when the military was seeking greater funding for the above-top-secret weapons.

After all, Truman pulled a similar stunt earlier in his presidency, when he ordered that Northrop’s experimental Flying Wing aircraft be flown over the capital to show its prowess. Unfortunately, the demonstration was marred by engine trouble, and this damaged its credibility going forward.

By contrast, the flying saucers were a swimming success, easily out-performing state-of-the-art jet fighters. And the rest can be found somewhere in the unwritten history of UFOs and the Pentagon. But I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Yes, Mr. Pope, UFOs disarmed U.S. nukes, and it was probably the Pentagon

Noticed this interview with Nick Pope.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6318781839112

I propose this was the U.S. military demonstrating an above-top-secret method to neutralize nuclear weapons, on the theory that, if we could shut down our own nukes, that means we’d be able to shut down Soviet nukes.

So, assuming we already had advanced field-propulsion vehicles in the 1960s, this super-secret weapon was outfitted with electromagnetic pulse technology capable of bombarding the hardened electronics in nuclear missile systems. This would have temporarily taken down the system. Following this line of reasoning, only a select group of military brass would know the real story behind the events. Only they would have a “need to know,” which explains why launch officials would to this day remain clueless about the true nature of what happened.

Also, in at least one example, a flying-saucer-like vehicle was seen following a missile as it was being launched, shinning a bright light onto the missile. I propose this light was possibly a high-intensity strobe that simulated gunfire or cannon fire.

I know this all sounds wild, but is it really any crazier than space aliens?

We know something radical happened. These encounters have been documented. The sources are impeccable. Rather than ET, however, I propose that it was just us all along.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Rep. Burchett is right about one thing: There is a huge UFO coverup

Congressman Tim Burchett is obviously a proponent of the wrongminded ET hypothesis – the idea that space aliens are behind UFOs – which, unfortunately, has been dominating the discussion about UFOs like FOREVER.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tim-burchett-ufos_n_63c4f371e4b0d6f0ba06361e

However, I give him kudos for being correct about one overarching issue: There is a HUGE UFO coverup in this country.  

At this point, it should be obvious that the Pentagon is hiding the truth about UFOs, in my opinion because officials have no real choice: The UFOs are above-top-secret U.S. weapons based on a revolutionary propulsion technology, call it field propulsion, antigravity, or whatever label you prefer. Therefore, the Pentagon certainly can’t tell Congress and the public the truth about these secret weapons because then they would no longer be, well, secret.

The reason human pilots can withstand the crushing G-forces that would be generated by something like the Tic Tac platform is because it is based on a different kind of physics. As our friends at Monty Python’s Flying Circus might say, and now for something completely different.

Going even further, I would suggest that the U.S. military has possessed this propulsion breakthrough, in one form or another, for many decades, going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, and it has been steadily evolving since then totally shrouded from the public.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

The Latest Big UFO Report is Bogus: The Pentagon Knows Exactly What They Are

So, why aren’t foreign military branches experiencing the same epidemic of UFO encounters? Why aren’t the UFOs cruising over New York City, Los Angeles, Paris, London, etc., on a regular basis?

Answer: Because the UFOs are advanced, above-top-secret U.S. weapons so classified they can’t be divulged to Congress, other members of the military, the president or anyone else lacking a “need to know.”

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/highly-anticipated-government-report-on-ufos-thin-on-new-evidence

At this point, I don’t know what the media are confused about. There has obviously been a huge breakthrough in propulsion technology. That’s why we’re seeing these encounters taking place on U.S. military training ranges. The pilots are U.S. military pilots, and they are training exactly where they should be training, over U.S. military facilities.

The Pentagon can’t divulge what these secret weapons are because, well, then they would no longer be secret. Duh!

This means the Luis Elizondos, the Tom DeLonges, To The Stars Academy, the late Harry Reid, etc., etc., etc. … all they’ve succeeded in doing is to unwittingly expose an above-top-secret U.S. military program based on field propulsion, antigravity, or whatever label you would like to apply.

Now that we’ve seen it, yeah, the B-21 bomber is definitely a flying saucer!

I speculated in a post about two weeks before the unveiling that the B-21 might be a “flying saucer.”

Now that we have seen it, or part of it, anyway, I’m doubling down: The thing is definitely a flying saucer!

As such, let’s just come right out and say it: It might be harnessing antigravity propulsion.

When I say flying saucer, I mean that, if not literally, then metaphorically. In other words, it’s not merely some iterative evolution of the B-2, as the official artist “interpretations” would have us believe.

It’s something different. In its recent twitter posting to announce the unveiling date, Northrop Grumman claims, “This changes everything.”

It’s probably just an exercise in corporate hyper-marketing, but if not, how does the B-21 change everything?  

For example, might it be capable of vertical takeoff and landing or hovering over a single location for hours at a time? Does the bomber possess radical new technology, possibly related to propulsion? Might it be capable of low-earth orbit?

There’s been a lot of talk about the B-21’s advanced prototyping, which has been a key factor in allowing Northrop Grumman to develop the bomber on time and on budget. In essence, components in the platform had already been designed, built and tested. Yet, the bomber was based on a “clean-sheet” design, meaning it is not an adaptation of the B-2 stealth bomber or other existing aircraft. Officials have also said the bomber is based on a “very mature” technology, yet not necessarily known to the public.

These two things seem contradictory: The bomber has largely been developed already, yet its design is not an extension of the B-2 or other aircraft. The technology is mature, yet unknown to the public.

What does it all mean?

Perhaps it means they’ve been flying this thing, in one form or another, for some time, existing entirely in the black. I would imagine there’s a whole grab bag of toys hidden under the cover of blackness waiting to be seeded into the white world. But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers.

As we near its historic unveiling, is the B-21 bomber a flying saucer?

Well, unless you’ve been living in a cave, you know by now that the much-anticipated rollout of the B-21 bomber is scheduled for Dec. 2. It is the most significant new military program in thirty years.

With the unveiling fast approaching, I thought it might be worth asking: Is the B-21 a flying saucer?

Answer: Hell yeah, the B-21 bomber’s a flying saucer, if not literally, then metaphorically. In other words, it’s not merely some iterative evolution of the B-2, as the official artist “interpretations” would have us believe.

It’s something different. In its recent twitter posting to announce the unveiling date, Northrop Grumman claims, “This changes everything.”

It’s probably just an exercise in corporate hyper-marketing, but if not, how does the B-21 change everything?  

For example, might it be capable of vertical takeoff and landing or hovering over a single location for hours at a time? Does the bomber possess radical new technology, possibly related to propulsion? Might it be capable of low-earth orbit?

There’s been a lot of talk about the B-21’s advanced prototyping, which has been a key factor in allowing Northrop Grumman to develop the bomber on time and on budget. In essence, components in the platform had already been designed, built and tested. Yet, the bomber was based on a “clean-sheet” design, meaning it is not an adaptation of the B-2 stealth bomber or other existing aircraft. Officials have also said the bomber is based on a “very mature” technology, yet not necessarily known to the public.

These two things seem contradictory: The bomber has largely been developed already, yet its design is not an extension of the B-2 or other aircraft. The technology is mature, yet unknown to the public.

What does it all mean?

Perhaps it means they’ve been flying this thing, in one form or another, for some time, existing entirely in the black. I would imagine there’s a whole grab bag of toys hidden under the cover of blackness waiting to be seeded into the white world. But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers.