#antigravity

The Latest Big UFO Report is Bogus: The Pentagon Knows Exactly What They Are

So, why aren’t foreign military branches experiencing the same epidemic of UFO encounters? Why aren’t the UFOs cruising over New York City, Los Angeles, Paris, London, etc., on a regular basis?

Answer: Because the UFOs are advanced, above-top-secret U.S. weapons so classified they can’t be divulged to Congress, other members of the military, the president or anyone else lacking a “need to know.”

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/highly-anticipated-government-report-on-ufos-thin-on-new-evidence

At this point, I don’t know what the media are confused about. There has obviously been a huge breakthrough in propulsion technology. That’s why we’re seeing these encounters taking place on U.S. military training ranges. The pilots are U.S. military pilots, and they are training exactly where they should be training, over U.S. military facilities.

The Pentagon can’t divulge what these secret weapons are because, well, then they would no longer be secret. Duh!

This means the Luis Elizondos, the Tom DeLonges, To The Stars Academy, the late Harry Reid, etc., etc., etc. … all they’ve succeeded in doing is to unwittingly expose an above-top-secret U.S. military program based on field propulsion, antigravity, or whatever label you would like to apply.

Now that we’ve seen it, yeah, the B-21 bomber is definitely a flying saucer!

I speculated in a post back in 2022 that the B-21 might be a “flying saucer.”

Now that we have seen it, I’m doubling down: The thing is definitely a flying saucer!

As such, let’s just come right out and say it: It might be harnessing a different kind of propulsion system.

When I say flying saucer, I mean that, if not literally, then metaphorically. In other words, it’s not merely some iterative evolution of the B-2. It’s something different.  

For example, might it be equipped with an electric field propulsion system? Perhaps the jet engines are actually gas turbine generators, providing electricity for this propulsion tech? Maybe that’s why the engines can be embedded so deeply within the airframe; they aren’t providing thrust, but electrical generation?

There’s been a lot of talk about the B-21’s advanced prototyping, which has been a key factor in allowing Northrop Grumman to develop the bomber on time and on budget. In essence, components in the platform had already been designed, built and tested. Yet, the bomber was based on a “clean-sheet” design, meaning it is not an adaptation of the B-2 stealth bomber or other existing aircraft. Officials have also said the bomber is based on a “very mature” technology, yet not necessarily known to the public.

These two things seem contradictory: The bomber has largely been developed already, yet its design is not an extension of the B-2 or other aircraft. The technology is mature, yet unknown to the public.

What does it all mean?

Perhaps it means they’ve been flying this thing, in one form or another, for some time, existing entirely in the black. I would imagine there’s a whole grab bag of toys hidden under the cover of blackness waiting to be seeded into the white world. But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers.

Pentagon’s big UFO reveal isn’t very revealing, maybe because flying saucers are probably from Utah, not Zeta Reticuli

Ok, so I’m not surprised the Pentagon is failing to satisfy the Congressional mandate to seriously investigate UFOs and to report the juicy details back to the taxpayers.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/ufo-briefings-congress-pentagon-00029315

This is an impossible task since revealing the true nature of UFOs, particularly those Tic Tac things and other seemingly alien wonders, would mean exposing above-top-secret U.S. military hardware.

So, yeah, flying saucers are probably from Utah, not Zeta Reticuli. But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Antigravity scientist evokes ghost of Thomas Townsend Brown

A scientist tells George Noory about Thomas Townsend Brown’s concepts, which, he says, could lead to a de facto antigravity propulsion system.

Here is an article quoting the scientist, Paul LaViolette, published in a tabloid, the Express.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1236266/mars-mission-nasa-journey-5-days-antigravity-thomas-brown-spahttps://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/1236266/mars-mission-nasa-journey-5-days-antigravity-thomas-brown-space-sptce-spt

To this I say, Duh! Well, of course. The Pentagon perfected this sort of propulsion system a long time ago.

But, hey, if you’re paying any attention at all I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Was antigravity one of Vannevar Bush’s crazy ‘loonshots’?

Vannevar Bush’s approach to innovation is highlighted In the recently published book “Loonshots” by physicist Safi Bahcall.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/12/loonshots-and-phase-transitions-are-the-key-to-innovation-physicist-argues/

The book delves into the value of pursuing concepts deemed high risk by the research community.

I can think of one crazy idea he likely helped foster: antigravity.

But I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!