In the following response to a reporter’s inquiry, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand uses some VERY interesting language regarding Congress’s quest for the truth about UFOs.
Here is the brief exchange published Aug. 8 in City & State New York, which covers New York politics and policy. (The full article is here: https://www.cityandstateny.com/personality/2023/08/kirsten-gillibrand-wants-know-truth-about-aliens/389198/)
Reporter: I understand you helped secure full funding for AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) this year, but do you feel like the U.S. is doing enough to research and review unidentified anomalous phenomena incidents?
Sen. Gillibrand: I think this AARO office is excellent and built to do this job. If there are special access programs – they are called SAP programs – that Congress was not read in on, we put an amendment in the defense bill to say they can’t be funded. We do not want to be misled. We do not want to be led astray. We want to get to the bottom of this and this office is perfectly positioned to do that work.
Well, alright, the senator’s a player!
It stands to reason that she wouldn’t have said “We do not want to be misled …” unless she thought there was at least a possibility that Congress was being misled and led astray. It also would appear that members of Congress are FINALLY coming to terms with the fact that the Pentagon is not telling the whole truth about UFOs and that some of these objects are likely top secret U.S. military weapons that are unknown to the public.
You know my opinion: It has always been the Pentagon, it has never been extraterrestrials.
Here, in a recent opinion piece appearing in The Hill, the writer has hit on a HUGE issue.
From the piece: “Either the U.S. government has mounted an extraordinary, decades-long coverup of UFO retrieval and reverse-engineering activities, or elements of the defense and intelligence establishment are engaging in a staggeringly brazen psychological disinformation campaign.”
I vote “staggeringly brazen psychological disinformation campaign.”
The main purpose of disinformation is to hide something. I contend that something is a series of propulsion breakthroughs that, if commercialized, would literally change the trajectory of human civilization. These are advances conjured up entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!
So, along those lines, if the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots isn’t ET, then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics, perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” being investigated by physicists, which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces caused by traditional chemical propulsion systems. We are talking instantaneous acceleration.
I also contend that the U.S. has had some form of antigravity or field propulsion technology either in development or in operation going all the way back to the immediate postwar period and that these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget.” As such, the existence of these systems is hidden from Congress, the executive branch and the public.
Perhaps the last president to have direct knowledge was Ike, but I digress …
Meanwhile, a decades-long disinformation campaign has been engineered to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET.
It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like David Grusch. Because, after all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.
And if you don’t think the Pentagon’s disinformation machinery is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we talking about? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to usher in a radical new means of transportation and enable the practical colonization of space? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘Are we alone?’ scenarios.
No one suspects that it’s all been engineered to be that way.
Do you think Mr. Grusch just woke up one day and said, oh, I know, it’s ET?
No, he was fed a diet of high-octane, professional-grade disinformation, likely with fake documents and fake data. Whatever it was, it was good enough to impress Grusch, who is no doubt a very intelligent, very educated person.
And it all fits nicely into a legacy of UFO disinformation going all the way back to 1952, when, I contend, President Truman arranged for a flyover of the experimental antigravity vehicles, much as he had ordered a similar demonstration of the flying wing aircraft, which flew over the White House in 1949.
After the 1952 UFO flap, generals quelled public concerns during a press conference, declaring that an atmospheric phenomenon called a “temperature inversion” caused radar blips mistaken for UFOs. Unfortunately, these objects also were observed visually. At any rate, it was a sham, but the media ate it up, setting the stage for what would follow: a seventy-year-long disinformation conspiracy surrounding UFOs.
But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!
Emil Venere 