#davidgrusch

Grusch’s UFO Disinformation Campaign – Whether Deliberate or Otherwise – Is Working, as Illustrated in His Most Recent Claims on Joe Rogan’s Podcast

I’ve written before about what appears to be an extensive, relentless and highly effective Pentagon disinformation program to confuse, distract and deceive the public and the media about the entire subject of UFOs. In the latest chapter of this brilliant, ongoing disinformation juggernaut, we have UFO whistleblower David Grusch making a series of bizarre claims about UFOs on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast. Among his revelations: The Pentagon has recovered at least 10 alien bodies, a former U.S. president (presumably Obama) told him about said aliens, etc., etc.

Maybe he actually believes these things. Who knows? But from a practical standpoint, it really doesn’t matter whether he does or doesn’t. The result is the same: The public and the mainstream media pretty much ignore whether the Pentagon might have developed astonishing breakthroughs in propulsion technology, a quantum leap so outrageous that it might easily be mistaken for alien spacecraft. Instead, we have story after story posing the question, “Are we alone?”

Anyway, here are various articles about Grusch’s latest claims:

US has found ‘at least’ ten alien bodies in crashed UFOs, says whistleblower

UFO whistleblower calls out congressmen in Joe Rogan interview

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/ex-us-intelligence-office-claims-us-has-variety-of-alien-bodies-4602888

https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/space/ufo-whistleblower-claims-us-has-variety-of-alien-bodies-interactions-may-have-occurred/news-story/158491ea3bb98e6a4e43574eb937b2dc

Grusch’s most recent complaint is that GOP Representatives Mike Turner of Ohio and Mike Rogers of Alabama are trying to block the disclosure of ET by not supporting a proposed amendment to the country’s annual defense bill that would force the U.S. government and the Pentagon to disclose programs related to space aliens.

At any rate, as I was saying, whether Grusch is part of, or a victim of, the Pentagon’s professional-grade disinformation machine, the result is the same: People (and the majority of the American media) read these articles with a chuckle and then look the other way.

And it all fits the same playbook going back decades. You find a source with impressive credentials. Then, you inject said source into the public domain either as a willing participant or a dupe, and you watch the media churn.

In the end, people are left scratching their heads, but that’s about it.

No one suspects that the entire operation is part of an effort to lead the media astray so that journalists won’t suspect that the Pentagon has made a series of propulsion breakthroughs, hidden in plain sight under the guise of ET visitations.

And if you don’t think the strategy is working, look at who’s paying attention to Grusch’s latest proclamations: VIRTUALLY NOBODY!

I mean, after all, if Mr. Grusch is not a willing purveyor of disinformation, then we have to assume he was led to believe these things through a sophisticated effort that included faked documents, data, photos, bogus eye-witness claims, etc. In other words, he was fed disinformation from people on the inside. Yet, no U.S. media organs have shown any overt interest in learning how or why this occurred and who’s responsible.

I would argue that the Grusch saga fits perfectly into the legacy of a well-organized disinformation machine going all the way back to 1952, when generals in full military panoply told journalists those saucers over Washington, D.C., were caused by an atmospheric phenomenon called a “temperature inversion.”

In actuality, I propose, those UFO sightings over our nation’s capital were part of a demonstration ordered by President Truman to prove the superiority of these vehicles. After all, Truman had ordered a similar demonstration earlier in his presidency for the Flying Wing aircraft, which flew over Pennsylvania Avenue at rooftop level in 1949.

Unfortunately for Northrop Corporation, the event was later marred by engine failure, setting back the project.

Not so for the flying saucers demonstration. In fact, under this “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs – i.e., it’s not ET, but human beings who invented antigravity — Truman was so intrigued that he ordered a follow-up flyover the next weekend to see how well the machines would outperform state-of-the-art jet fighters.

Well, they performed magnificently, which would have engendered more financial backing for the fledgling antigravity program.

Yes, InsideHook, we’ve always been asking the wrong question about UFOs: Instead of ‘are we alone?’ we might have been asking ‘are we being deceived by the Pentagon?’

I noticed an article about yet another UFO book – this new offering by celebrated author and journalist Garrett M. Graff – and it seems to indicate that the American media might finally be getting it: Yes, there’s a gigantic UFO coverup, but it has nothing to do with space aliens.

Better late than never!

Appearing in a publication called InsideHook, the article touches on an excerpt from Graff’s book that was recently showcased in The Atlantic.

https://www.insidehook.com/culture/we-asking-wrong-questions-ufos

I would argue that until recently the Fourth Estate has snubbed the entire subject of UFOs, leaving it to the realm of so-called “ufologists,” who have always been asking the wrong question. Instead of wondering incessantly whether we’re alone in the universe, they should have been asking whether the Pentagon has developed secret weapons that are so different from conventional aircraft that they could be confused with alien spacecraft.

Unfortunately, the people who have chosen to investigate UFOs are fully invested – both emotionally and financially – in the extraterrestrial hypothesis (i.e., the UFOs are E.T.), which has dominated the whole national conversation about UFOs since the beginning. So, if you set out to prove the UFOs are extraterrestrial, you’re going to find E.T. no matter what.

But there’s an alternative view: The E.T. hypothesis is nothing more than a powerful myth created and reinforced by popular culture and the Pentagon’s own disinformation apparatus.

Perhaps what ufologists should have been asking all along is whether the Department of Defense has developed propulsion breakthroughs since the end of World War II, funded through the Pentagon’s thriving “black budget,” which keeps these innovations hidden from Congress, the executive branch and the public.

If true, this would mean there has been absolutely no oversight for a quantum leap in military technology that is arguably as important as the development of nuclear weapons. Or, possibly even a series of breakthroughs, which if commercialized would literally change the trajectory of human civilization, revolutionizing the transportation industry.

As to why the Pentagon would be flying these weapons over populated areas, maybe it’s real-world training, a “living lab” to perfect tactics and to study how well they perform against state-of-the-art, white-world technologies like F-16s. After all, there are examples of military training exercises taking place over cities. This article in The War Zone documents one such exercise over Los Angeles: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/38753/those-mysterious-gray-helicopters-were-landing-on-multiple-downtown-la-rooftops-last-night

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the intellectual morass of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that the UFOs are extraterrestrials, or they are just making money off the E.T. hypothesis.

We’re talking about relentless, industrial-strength disinformation, good enough to fool technical experts like UFO whistleblower David Grusch.

So, following this “terrestrial hypothesis” a little further, the Pentagon can’t tell the truth about UFOs without exposing top-secret weapons. The DoD’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), therefore, will never be able to really “get to the bottom” of the UFO mystery because it’s part of the Pentagon, which is responsible for the UFOs in the first place.

That would mean the whole marketing narrative that the Pentagon is suddenly pursuing a policy of UFO “transparency” is totally bogus.  In fact, you could argue that the Pentagon simply cannot be more candid about this subject without endangering national security.

Adding to the whole disinformation aspect, AARO’s outgoing director, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, has curiously co-authored a scientific paper proposing that extraterrestrial motherships could be visiting our solar system and sending “alien probes” to Earth. He has also suggested that metallic orbs have been detected flying all around the Earth — this includes a mysterious object observed recently over the Middle East — and that some of these orbs are showing unusual characteristics.

Hence, the implication is that the metallic orbs ARE the alien probes. And, see, it’s all backed up with hard science in a research paper authored by brainiac Ph.D. physicists! However, it’s worth pointing out that the “orb” seen over the Middle East has been shown to have likely just been a party balloon.

Anyway, thank you Mr. Graff!

AARO is purveying UFO disinformation when its director pens a research paper about ‘alien probes’ and suggests E.T. might be in our ‘back yard’

By now there should be little doubt that the Department of Defense’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, is a purveyor of UFO disinformation.

Exhibit A: Outgoing Director Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick has suggested that numerous “metallic orbs” might be flying around the world, making unusual maneuvers and such, and that these objects could be extraterrestrial. Fitting neatly into this story line, he has co-authored a research paper proposing that alien motherships could be visiting our solar system and sending “alien probes” to Earth.

Hence, this implies that the metallic orbs could be these alien probes.

The problem is, the supposed “orbs” are probably only balloons, as recently highlighted by a research group that determined one such orb captured on video in the Middle East was likely just a party balloon. (https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2023/10/24/isnt-that-a-balloon-deflating-a-dod-ufo-video/)

Dr. Kirkpatrick has further reinforced the bogus extraterrestrial hypothesis by recently proclaiming that UFOs spotted by U.S. Navy pilots are either from adversarial nations or alien planets. 

But there’s an alternative view: The UFOs, notably the most sensational ones that perform seemingly physics-defying maneuvers, are neither foreign nor extraterrestrial. They are products of our own Pentagon, and they have been evolving ever since the end of World War II, when U.S. pilots observed mysterious glowing objects over the European theater.

Some have proposed that these were a product of Nazi Germany. We know that times of war provide a unique catalyst for the development of radically novel technologies. We know that the Nazis brought us Wernher von Braun, who led work to develop Germany’s V-2 ballistic missile and who was a critical force in the design of NASA’s Saturn V moon rocket and the early success of the U.S. space program; the Nazis brought us designs for the first jet-powered flying wing aircraft; the Nazis brought us the first turbine engines and jet aircraft; the Nazis brought us the first operational cruise missile. Of course, along the way they brutally murdered thousands of slave laborers.

It is an ugly fact of history that the United States didn’t seem to have many ethical or moral reservations when it came to employing former Nazi scientists and engineers after the war. We did not hesitate to capitalize on Nazi-era advances in our struggle to establish global dominance and keep pace with the Soviets during the burgeoning Cold War that pitted both nuclear powers against each other. So, there is precedent for Nazi scientists and engineers being embedded into American research and development programs.

Then, according to this “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs, after the war, just as von Braun was helping the United States gain space dominance, other Nazi scientists and engineers were helping the Pentagon develop advanced field-propulsion platforms. Call them flying saucers, if you like.

Fast-forward to the year 2023, and these vehicles have been steadily evolving, entirely in the dark with the help of the Pentagon’s thriving “black budget,” which shrouds knowledge of them from Congress, the executive branch, and the public.

When the late, great Sen. Harry Reid launched his investigation into UFOs, this exposed recent UFO encounters by U.S. Navy pilots. But these UFOs weren’t extraterrestrial. They were top-secret U.S. weapons, the knowledge of which is extremely compartmentalized, so much so that even the Navy pilots who encountered them did not have a “need to know.”

So, the UFOs were never extraterrestrial. The entire E.T. hypothesis, therefore, is nothing more than a powerful myth created and reinforced by popular culture and the Pentagon’s own disinformation apparatus.

Why?

Because so long as people, and the media, believe the UFOs are extraterrestrial, they won’t suspect that the Pentagon has achieved a series of propulsion breakthroughs. In this column in The Hill, we see how effective the Pentagon’s ongoing disinformation efforts have been: https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4301944-aliens-or-a-foreign-power-pentagon-ufo-chief-says-someone-is-in-our-backyard/

At any rate, under the terrestrial hypothesis, AARO can’t “get to the bottom” of the ongoing UFO mystery because in doing so it would be exposing top-secret Pentagon weapons.

This may sound too fantastic, but is it any crazier than space aliens traveling trillions of miles from another solar system, only to crash repeatedly, then to hang out over obscure U.S. military training ranges, inexplicably tormenting the denizens of places like rural Texas?

War Zone article reveals juicy tidbits from AARO UFO press briefing: Satellite surveillance has found no space aliens and after questioning likely Grusch sources, no evidence to support his E.T. claims …

I found this article in the War Zone about Tuesday’s UFO presser to be very enlightening.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/balloons-no-ufos-found-by-satellites-shoot-down-video-coming-says-aaro-chief

My main takeaways: The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) has reviewed many satellite images, finding plenty of balloons but no space aliens.

Secondly, the office will soon release videos of UFOs being shot down by military aircraft earlier this year.

Thirdly, whistleblower David Grusch has not contacted AARO to talk about what he knows, or thinks he knows, information that seems to contradict a statement by Grusch that he briefed AARO’s head Sean Kirkpatrick. Also, VERY interestingly, AARO has interviewed Grusch’s likely sources and found no corroboration of his extraterrestrial claims.

From the War Zone article:

(Grusch also testified that he briefed Kirkpatrick on his claims in July of 2022 and that Kirkpatrick never followed up. You can see that exchange in this video below.

Tuesday, Kirkpatrick said that Grusch has yet to respond to requests by AARO to meet and that the last time the two spoke was five years ago. Kirkpatrick said he was in the intelligence directorate of U.S. Space Command at the time and the conversation “was not on this topic.”

“I think we’ve interviewed most of the people that he may have talked to, but we don’t know that. And we have extended an invitation at least four or five times for him to come in over the last eight months or so, and has been declined.”

Citing privacy concerns, Kirkpatrick declined to offer any specifics about who he talked to or just what they said. He did, however, say that “I currently have no evidence of any program having ever existed to do any sort of reverse engineering of a sort of extraterrestrial UAP.”)

This raises various questions, including. 1) Why the disconnect between Kirkpatrick and Grusch, and why no corroboration after interviewing Grusch’s likely sources? 2) Did these people lie to Grusch? Did these people feed Grusch disinformation? 3) Why has Grusch not spoken to AARO?

So many questions …

Pentagon’s AARO UFO Office Tells Potential Whistleblowers Not to Include “Sensitive or Classified” Information on New Reporting Form, But How Could it NOT Be Sensitive or Classified Information?

I’m racking my brain trying to figure out how UFO whistleblowers who work or worked for the government are going to report about their first-hand knowledge of top-secret UFO-related experiences without including “potentially sensitive or classified information.”

I mean, just by its very nature, such information would be sensitive and/or classified, right? And if people did report sensitive or classified information, would they be subject to punishment?

Here are a couple of articles in the mainstream media (the New York Post and Politico) reporting on the new development, announced on Oct. 31, 2023.

https://nypost.com/2023/10/31/news/pentagon-unveils-ufo-reporting-portal/

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/31/pentagon-announces-long-waited-ufo-reporting-form-00124574

About Spielberg’s ‘Encounters’ UFO Documentary, I Propose ‘Big Black Delta’ is One of Ours

So, I’ve been reading with alacrity all of the reviews of Spielberg’s new Netflix UFO documentary Encounters. One of the highlights is the giant delta-shaped object observed by multiple witnesses in Stephenville, Texas.

Here is one news article, published by the New York Post:

https://nypost.com/2023/09/28/spielberg-produced-ufo-doc-has-more-than-300-witnesses-for-spaceship/

Anyway, I propose this object is a top-secret U.S. military weapon. The same craft has been observed during various other encounters over the past three decades.

My hypothesis is that Big Black Delta is among a group of antigravity platforms that also includes the Tic Tac vehicle observed in 2004 by U.S. Navy pilots – advanced-propulsion weapons that have been developed entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!

According to this “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs, the evolution of these vehicles began during the immediate postwar period and they have been kept under wraps since that time, all the while becoming more and more sophisticated and shrouded entirely from Congress, the executive branch and the public. This supposition presumes that none of the UFOs are extraterrestrial and that the entire space-alien hypothesis is just a myth fed by popular culture and the Pentagon’s disinformation apparatus.

As to why the Pentagon would be flying these weapons over populated areas, perhaps it’s real-world training, a “living lab” to perfect tactics and to study how well they perform against state-of-the-art, white-world technologies like F-16s. There are many examples of military training exercises taking place over populated areas. This article in The War Zone documents one such exercise over Los Angeles: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/38753/those-mysterious-gray-helicopters-were-landing-on-multiple-downtown-la-rooftops-last-night

Anyway, it’s as good a theory as space aliens traveling trillions of miles across the gulf of space to hang out over Stephenville, Texas.

Regarding Big Black Delta specifically, I dedicate many pages of my book Flying Saucers to this hypothetical platform.

There have been tantalizing clues that the Pentagon might be hiding the existence of such weapons under cover of national security. For example, U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has recently made some VERY intriguing comments that appear to support the idea that some of the UFOs encountered by Navy pilots could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated in the dark.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

In essence, Sen. Gillibrand said information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a need to know only.  She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb. The senator appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, citing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions that said including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So, there is a lot of fear.

So, I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”

Sen. Gillibrand seems to be alluding to a conflict between Congress and the Pentagon, with the Pentagon restricting access to information that is directly related to UFO sightings.

In my opinion, UFOs have never been about E.T. Based on witness testimony, it certainly appears that the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough – call it antigravity, if you like – which is unknown to Congress. However, the Pentagon can’t admit that it has antigravity because, well, then it would no longer be secret. It all makes perfect sense, in a convoluted kind of way.

I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to 1947, the U.S. has had some form of antigravity or field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since then. If this is true, then these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s “black budget,” keeping them hidden from the public.

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the intellectual morass of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. This is industrial-strength disinformation, good enough to convince technical experts like David Grusch. Then, once you start talking about E.T. crashes and dead aliens, interdimensional beings, time travelers, and the Vatican’s in on the whole secret, the public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just making money off the E.T. hypothesis.

So, if this terrestrial hypothesis is correct – and the Pentagon does, indeed, have antigravity, this raises a whole host of follow-up concerns and questions, including:

  • Do we have a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force? If so, do we have military bases in deep space?
  • When the SR-71 blackbird was retired in 1990, was it replaced with another, more advanced platform capable of reaching any destination in the world quickly and on short notice. Is Big Black Delta that platform?  
  • In addition to antigravity, have we developed a propulsion system that harnesses the Casimir effect? This might explain the incredible performance observed by police officers in southern Illinois in 2000. At least one of the officers said the ship darted from place to place, instantly leaping several miles at a time.
  • If we have, indeed, developed such a propulsion system, have we gone interstellar?    

Of course, in exploring the terrestrial hypothesis there are many additional potential questions you could pose.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already pondered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

I agree with U.S. Rep. Burchett (@ReptimBurchett): There’s a UFO coverup, it just has nothing to do with space aliens …

Interesting little squib in The Hill about a smackdown from the intelligence community’s inspector general. In response to Rep. Tim Burchett’s request for information about claims made by whistleblower David Grusch, the inspector general said there is no relevant information to share.

GOP rep renews UFO ‘cover-up’ claim after Intel watchdog response

My own opinion is that the whole UFO conundrum has nothing to do with extraterrestrials. It’s all about covering up top-secret U.S. weapons, notably advanced propulsion systems unknown to the general public, Congress and the executive branch.

That’s why there’s no information to share. It’s not E.T., and the intelligence community certainly isn’t going to share information about classified “black projects” at the Pentagon.

Meanwhile, the sophisticated disinformation being fed to officials like Grusch is very effective in distraction and obfuscation because once you entangle the UFO issue within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens, the Vatican, and other such nonsense, you relegate the story to the fringe. People don’t ask about top secret Pentagon weapons; instead, they pose fanciful questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings and various ‘we are not alone’ scenarios. This, in turn, dissuades the mainstream media from inquiring further because the whole story becomes suspect.

I know it sounds crazy, but is it any crazier than E.T. coming here from another solar system just so they can hang out almost exclusively over U.S. military training ranges? We aren’t seeing this epidemic of UFO encounters with the foreign military branches. Now, why exactly is that?

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Great UFO analysis in The Washington Spectator, but, again, the writer misses a major point: Just because it isn’t E.T. doesn’t mean it isn’t something profoundly important

Excellent analysis piece in The Washington Spectator by writer Art Levine.

https:/I/washingtonspectator.org/ufo-tales-falling-apart-after-hearings/

Unfortunately, however, he fails to recognize two really important factors in the whole UFO saga:

  1. Just because the UFOs aren’t extraterrestrial, that doesn’t mean they aren’t something hugely important. That “something,” I contend, is a quantum leap in propulsion technology achieved not with the help of E.T. but entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us a long list of scientific and technological wonders over the centuries.  
  2. There’s a UFO disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. so that journalists like Art Levine won’t ask whether the Pentagon might be hiding a series of propulsion breakthroughs that, if commercialized, would literally alter the trajectory of human civilization by ushering in a radical new means of transportation. These are advances paid for entirely, by the way, with tax dollars.

Mr. Levine, like virtually every other journalist who has recently held forth on this subject, has failed to ask why whistleblower David Grusch and others are being fed disinformation, and exactly who is manufacturing and distributing said disinformation. Also, what is the nature of this disinformation? Is it documents, is it photographs? Learning these details could be very instructive.

Regardless, here is the bottom line: The UFOs have never been extraterrestrial. They have always been Uncle Sam. They were Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when President Harry Truman likely ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after unwittingly observing flights of the top-secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a top-secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shoot straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters recently described by U.S. Navy pilots.

I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, the Pentagon has had some form of field propulsion or antigravity technology either in development or in operation since that time. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark, nurtured by the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget,” hidden from Congress and the executive branch, for longer than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s E.T. or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about now? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a breakthrough in propulsion technology? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

Meanwhile, it is true that skeptical members of the media haven’t fallen for the whole E.T. hypothesis, but they have nevertheless been fooled by Pentagon disinformation: They correctly recognize that it isn’t E.T., but then they incorrectly fail to understand that there is still a huge story here.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t seriously considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Article in today’s @washingtonpost by reporter @terrence_mccoy: ‘In U.S., most UFO documentation is classified. Not so in other countries.’ Now, why might that be?

Here’s an interesting — and exceedingly rare — article about UFOs in the Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/09/06/ufo-brazil-documents-classified/

The bottom line is this: The United States is far more secretive about UFOs than are other countries.

Now, why might this be?

Hmmm … could it be that the United States is hiding something? Could that ‘something’ be that the United States is the source of said UFOs?

I say yes. I say the UFOs have never been extraterrestrial. They have always been Uncle Sam. They were Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when, I speculate, President Harry Truman ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after observing flights of the top secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a top-secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shoot straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters recently described by U.S. Navy pilots.

It certainly appears that based on witness testimony the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. Call it antigravity, if you like. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since that time. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark, nurtured by the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget,” hidden from Congress and the executive branch, for longer than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like whistleblower David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about now? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to alter the trajectory of the human race by ushering in a radical new means of transportation? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Commentary in socialist publication @jacobin nails the UFO issue cold: Just because they aren’t extraterrestrial doesn’t mean there’s nothing to see here … genius!

Ok, so, this is possibly a first! Someone in the media has finally addressed the two most important aspects of the whole UFO conundrum that’s been confounding America:

Point number one is, just because the UFOs aren’t extraterrestrial, that doesn’t mean there’s nothing to see here.

Secondly, David Grusch evidently was fed industrial-strength disinformation to cover up something. So, exactly what was the nature of this disinformation?

https://jacobin.com/2023/08/ufos-aliens-government-secrets-whistleblowers-transparency

Also, I’ll add a third point of my own: What is that “something” the Pentagon is going to such great lengths to cover up? Could that something be a top-secret breakthrough in propulsion technology – developed with tax dollars – a quantum leap that if commercialized would greatly benefit society?

You know my opinion, that the UFOs have never been ET. They have always been Uncle Sam. They were Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when, I speculate, President Harry Truman ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after unknowingly observing flights of the top secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a top-secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shoot straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters recently described by U.S. Navy pilots.

It certainly appears that based on witness testimony the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. Call it antigravity, if you like. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to the immediate postwar period, the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since that time. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark, nurtured by the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget,” hidden from Congress and the executive branch, for longer than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like whistleblower David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think this professional-grade mendacity is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we all talking about now? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a HUGE technological breakthrough in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to alter the trajectory of the human race by ushering in a radical new means of transportation and enabling the practical colonization of space? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘are we alone?’ scenarios.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!