Reading through the final National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), it appears to severely curtail efforts to increase the transparency of UFO or UAP phenomena.
At one point, it says UFO disclosure may be postponed if there is clear and convincing evidence that: the threat to the military defense, intelligence operations, or conduct of foreign relations of the United States posed by the public disclosure of the unidentified anomalous phenomena is of such gravity that it outweighs the public interest in disclosure, and such public disclosure would reveal … (Then it goes on to list items such as sensitive intelligence entities, sources and methods.)
The most restrictive language appears to be Section 1687, entitled, “LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN UNREPORTED PROGRAMS”
I found items 5 and 6 to be especially intriguing. Anyway, unless I’m reading this incorrectly, the section appears to prohibit revelations related to:
(5) The development of propulsion technology, or aerospace craft that uses propulsion technology, systems, or subsystems that is based on or derived from or inspired by inspection, analysis, or reverse engineering of recovered unidentified anomalous phenomena craft or materials; and (6) Any aerospace craft that uses propulsion technology other than chemical propellants, solar power, and electric ion thrust.
I guess the obvious question is, what other types of propulsion are there?
If I’m misreading this document, I stand corrected! There just hasn’t been any coverage yet in the media, except for a few very brief articles.
Emil Venere 