So, the recent episode of mystery drones flying over New Jersey is nothing, well, new; it’s just another page from the long and storied history of the UFO saga in this country, and it all goes back to the Pentagon.
It’s a story that begins with those flying saucers over Washington, D.C., in 1952, and includes that huge triangular thing over the Hudson Valley in the 1980s, the Phoenix lights in 1997 and various and sundry other UFO flaps over the decades.
As crazy as it sounds, all of these episodes have just been the Pentagon flying its top-secret toys … testing, training, psyops, sending not-so-veiled messages to the public and to our adversaries alike.
” ‘A group of Morris County mayors and other local elected officials are demanding answers and action by authorities concerning the multiple sightings of drones in North Jersey in recent weeks.
‘We look at it this way,” they wrote. “Either higher level officials know what’s going on and are not concerned or they are negligent for not apprehending and identifying one of these drones.
‘We strongly request a proactive approach be taken on the half of the residents of New Jersey and Morris County,’ they wrote. ‘These drones have to land at some point somewhere and these offices need to follow them and identify where they are going and who owns them and is operating them.’
Residents ‘pay a fortune for government,’ they wrote, and ‘right now either our government is keeping us in the dark or they are failing to act on taxpayers concerns over these unidentified drones.’ “
To this, I say, the government has been keeping us all in the dark for many decades.
Finally, we have a member of Congress acknowledging something fundamental about the entire UFO saga in this country: That the Pentagon is likely hiding the existence of top-secret propulsion technologies, even from the president and members of Congress.
“At a minimum, publicly available Pentagon information strongly suggests there is incredible aerospace technology being fielded today that the American public, and even most members of Congress, are unaware of.
‘I’m not saying share everything. Maybe there are weapons programs we’re testing that it’s a fair thing we don’t want the American public to know about,” Ms. Mace said.
In a worst-case scenario, Ms. Mace said, individuals or departments within the Pentagon, intelligence community and other corners of the government could be keeping secrets from the White House itself.
‘Are they keeping the president of the United States in the dark?’ she said.”
Anyway, I’ve been saying this for years, and it’s a point of view we might call the “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs, and it goes something like this:
The UFOs are not extraterrestrial and they have never been. Instead, the Pentagon has made a series of astonishing propulsion breakthroughs going all the way back to the first important sighting, that of Kenneth Arnold in 1947.
Instead of jumping automatically to the extraterrestrial hypothesis, we should first fully entertain and explore the terrestrial hypothesis. So, for example, the “Tic Tac” object encountered in 2004 by Navy pilots over a U.S. military training range, is, in fact, a U.S. military platform. That’s why it was observed there. Furthermore, the fact that this encounter took place over a training range would suggest that these are not “experimental aircraft,” but operational platforms. I would also propose that the Pentagon has likely developed various top-secret platforms, entirely unknown to the public and developed over the past seven decades or so, thanks to a burgeoning “black budget” that keeps these programs hidden from Congress.
Logically, then, the terrestrial hypothesis would suggest that a whole bizarre inventory of encounters involving U.S. military personnel and civilians alike have always been top-secret Pentagon technologies known only to a small circle with a “need to know.” Everything from those UFOs that disabled nuclear missile launch systems back in the 1960s, to the huge triangular thing observed over the Hudson Valley in the 1980s, the “Phoenix lights” in 1997, another huge triangular thing encountered by police officers in rural Illinois in 2000, the flying disc over Chicago O’Hare in 2006, the Tic Tacs, etc., etc.
Moreover, the performance characteristics of these objects were such that there is one overarching likelihood suggested by this historical record of sightings: The Pentagon has developed exotic and highly unconventional propulsion systems that it has hidden from the public all these years.
Meanwhile, it certainly appears that there has been a disinformation effort to confuse people, and the media, about the whole subject of UFOs, publishing books by former military personnel who claim to have encountered extraterrestrials. It’s a legacy that in my opinion goes back many years and includes The Day After Roswell, published in 1997. (If you are interested, please read my review of The Day After Roswell, which I regard as a masterpiece of disinformation, here, https://emilvenere.com/files/138490884.pdf)
As to why the Pentagon would sometimes be flying these weapons over populated areas, perhaps it’s real-world training, a “living lab” to perfect tactics and to study how well they perform against state-of-the-art, white-world technologies like F-16s. There have been examples of military training exercises taking place over populated areas. This excellent article in The War Zone documents one such exercise over Los Angeles: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/38753/those-mysterious-gray-helicopters-were-landing-on-multiple-downtown-la-rooftops-last-night
Anyway, this terrestrial hypothesis for UFOs leads to many follow-up questions and concerns, chief among them: Is there a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force that is far more capable than either of those entities? If so, how far have we gone? Do we have military bases in deep space? Are any of these top-secret platforms nuclear-powered?
At any rate, bravo Rep. Nancy Mace, bravo! Better late to the party than not at all!
Reading this article from CBS News about the most recent UFO report from the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the cynic in me says something isn’t quite right here.
Interesting comments from Ryan Graves. He notes that, although AARO showed the UFO in the “GOFAST” video wasn’t going fast, they never explained what the heck it was. Hmmm …
And, regarding those 21 still-unsolved cases in the report, the AARO director, a brainiac physicist and engineer, says he’s stumped.
Maybe the reason he is stumped is because these are all top-secret Pentagon weapons and AARO doesn’t have a need to know. Even if Dr. Kosloski did know, he wouldn’t be permitted to divulge this because people go to prison for revealing top-secret U.S. weapons to the world at large.
Just saying.
What if the UFOs are all ultra-classified U.S. weapons? No government agency including AARO would be able to reveal this, so isn’t it a bit ridiculous to expect them to?
Like most tabloid fare, this article about veteran Area 51 researcher Joerg Arnu contains very little useful information. Yet, it is important because Arnu expresses his opinion that the base does not harbor extraterrestrial technologies. The article appeared recently in The Sun newspaper.
Area 51 has been central to alien conspiracy theories over the years. It is crucial to unfounded claims that the U.S. government is hiding technologies captured from crashed alien spacecraft. In fact, you could argue that without space aliens at Area 51, the whole connection between UFOs and extraterrestrials falls apart.
If anyone were to detect evidence of E.T. at Area 51, you would think it would have been Arnu, who has dedicated decades to pursuing the truth about what goes on at the base.
Here are some relevant excerpts from The Sun article:
“While Arnu believes the base primarily focuses on military technology – he respects others may have different interpretations.
“He said: ‘Who am I to say that my opinion is the right one?‘
“I think it’s military, but the alien people think there are 21 underground levels of torture facilities for aliens …
“From his analysis of hundreds of satellite images and his visits to the secret site, Arnu believes the government is developing cutting-edge stealth aircraft, advanced drones, and experimental weaponry – that could revolutionise modern warfare.
“Over his years of research, Arnu has observed several indications that cutting-edge military technologies are being developed at Area 51.“
Well, there you have it. The UFOs are still not E.T.
Here is the nut graph from the Post article: “The tech mogul claims that the government is likely regularly testing out ‘new aircraft, new missiles, and things’ that are classified at such a high level that even those high up in the chain of command in the US military may not be aware (they) are being tested.”
It also seems like he’s onto something with this observation, as reported in the New York Post article: “He argued that the government would villainize aliens if it knew of their existence to easily green-light military spending.”
Anyway, what this all means is that it’s high time that we started to seriously entertain the “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs, and it goes something like this:
1) The UFOs are not extraterrestrial, and they have never been. Instead, the Pentagon has made a series of astonishing technological breakthroughs in propulsion going all the way back to the first important UFO sighting, that of Kenneth Arnold in 1947. These technologies are so unconventional they could easily be mistaken for something from another planet.
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, former head of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), has alluded to this possibility in his writings and statements. He and AARO’s official UFO report, which reviews sightings and encounters since 1945, have unequivocally stated that witnesses, including members of the military, have unwittingly observed top-secret U.S. weapons and have mistaken these systems for extraterrestrial visitation.
Logically, then, the terrestrial hypothesis would suggest that a whole bizarre inventory of encounters involving U.S. military personnel and civilians alike have always been top-secret Pentagon technologies known only to a small circle of people with the appropriate clearances. Everything from those UFOs that disabled nuclear missile launch systems back in the 1960s, to the huge triangular thing observed over the Hudson Valley in the 1980s, the “Phoenix lights” in 1997, another huge triangular thing encountered by police officers in rural Illinois in 2000, the flying disc over Chicago O’Hare in 2006, the “Tic Tac” encountered by U.S. Navy pilots in 2004, etc.
Moreover, the performance characteristics of these objects were such that there is one overarching likelihood suggested by this historical record of sightings: The Pentagon has developed exotic and highly unconventional propulsion systems that it has hidden from the public all these years.
This terrestrial hypothesis for UFOs leads to many follow-up questions and concerns, chief among them: Is there a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force that is far more capable than either of those entities? If so, how far have we gone? Do we have military bases in deep space? Are any of these top-secret platforms nuclear-powered?
Meanwhile, it certainly appears that there has been a disinformation effort to confuse people, and the media, about the whole subject of UFOs — various tales by former military personnel who claim to have encountered extraterrestrials. It’s a legacy that in my opinion goes back many years and includes The Day After Roswell, published in 1997.
(If you are interested, please read my review of The Day After Roswell, which I regard as a masterpiece of disinformation, here, https://emilvenere.com/files/138490884.pdf)
So, I would argue that you have opposing forces working against each other. You have AARO conducting legitimate investigations into UFOs, but then you have other elements, some of them possibly even within government, working to promote disinformation, contradicting AARO.
Why? Because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the intellectual morass of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. Books and other media are carefully designed to confuse people, especially journalists, so that they’ll dismiss the whole business of UFOs as nonsense and won’t start to wonder whether it’s been the Pentagon all along that’s been flying these things.
So, I’ve been relishing all the mainstream media coverage of Luis Elizondo’s new memoir, where he penned some really over-the-top revelations and allegedly spills the beans on all sorts of UFO secrets.
However, alternatively, I wonder if his new book is just the latest example of government disinformation, a legacy that in my opinion goes back many years and includes The Day After Roswell, published in 1997.
(If you are interested, please read my review of The Day After Roswell, which I regard as a masterpiece of disinformation, here, https://emilvenere.com/files/138490884.pdf)
So, let’s do whatever one does to relax, sit back and venture off into unfamiliar territory when it comes to UFOs. Let’s call this territory the “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs, and it goes something like this:
1) The UFOs are not extraterrestrial, and they have never been. Instead, the Pentagon has made a series of astonishing technological breakthroughs in propulsion going all the way back to the first important UFO sighting, that of Kenneth Arnold in 1947. These technologies are so unconventional they could easily be mistaken for something from another planet.
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, former head of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), has alluded to this possibility in his writings and statements. He and AARO’s official UFO report, which reviews sightings and encounters since 1945, have unequivocally stated that witnesses, including members of the military, have unwittingly observed top-secret technologies and have mistaken these systems for extraterrestrial visitation.
Here are some excerpts from the AARO report:
• AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentification of never-before-seen experimental and operational space, rocket, and air systems, including stealth technologies and the proliferation of drone platforms.
• AARO concludes many of these programs represent authentic, current and former sensitive, national security programs, but none of these programs have been involved with capturing, recovering, or reverse-engineering off-world technology or material.
• In many cases, the interviewees named authentic USG (U.S. government) classified programs well-known and understood to those appropriately accessed to them in the Executive Branch and Legislative Branch; however, the interviewees mistakenly associated these authentic USG programs with alien and extraterrestrialactivity.
• AARO assesses that all of the named and described alleged hidden UAP reverse-engineering programs provided by interviewees either do not exist; are misidentified authentic, highly-sensitive national security programs that are not related to extraterrestrial technology exploitation …
• The interviewees and others who have mistakenly associated authentic sensitive national security programs with UAP had incomplete or unauthorized access to these programs; discussion of these programs outside of secure facilities presents a high risk of exposing national security information.]
2) Back to the terrestrial hypothesis, secondly, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation effort to make people think the UFOs are E.T. because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the intellectual morass of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. Books and other media are carefully designed to confuse people, including journalists, so that they won’t start to wonder whether it’s been the Pentagon all along that’s been flying these things.
Hey, I get it, people want to believe! I used to be there, but after many years of looking at all the available information I have found no compelling evidence that space aliens are responsible for UFOs.
The only thing that is clear is that something is there. The UFOs do exist. So, I would propose that instead of jumping automatically to the extraterrestrial hypothesis, we first fully entertain and explore the terrestrial hypothesis. So, for example, the “Tic Tac” object encountered in 2004 by Navy pilots over a U.S. military training range, is, in fact, a U.S. military platform. That’s why it was observed there. Furthermore, the fact that this encounter took place over a training range, as opposed to a test range, would suggest that it was not an “experimental aircraft,” but an operational platform. I would also propose that the Pentagon has likely developed various top-secret platforms, entirely unknown to the public and developed over the past seven decades or so, thanks to a burgeoning “black budget” that keeps these programs hidden from Congress.
Logically, then, this terrestrial hypothesis would suggest that a whole bizarre inventory of encounters involving U.S. military personnel and civilians alike have always been top-secret Pentagon technologies known only to a small circle with a “need to know.” Everything from those UFOs that disabled nuclear missile launch systems back in the 1960s, to the huge triangular thing observed over the Hudson Valley in the 1980s, the “Phoenix lights” in 1997, another huge triangular thing encountered by police officers in rural Illinois in 2000, the flying disc over Chicago O’Hare in 2006, the Tic Tacs, etc., etc.
Moreover, the performance characteristics of these objects were such that there is one overarching likelihood suggested by this historical record of sightings: The U.S. military has developed exotic and highly unconventional propulsion systems that it has hidden from the public all these years.
As to why the Pentagon would sometimes be flying these weapons over populated areas, perhaps it’s real-world training, a “living lab” to perfect tactics and to study how well they perform against state-of-the-art, white-world technologies like F-16s. There have been examples of military training exercises taking place over populated areas. This excellent article in The War Zone documents one such exercise over Los Angeles: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/38753/those-mysterious-gray-helicopters-were-landing-on-multiple-downtown-la-rooftops-last-night
Anyway, the terrestrial hypothesis for UFOs leads to many follow-up questions and concerns, chief among them: Is there a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force that is far more capable than either of those entities? If so, how far have we gone? Do we have military bases in deep space? Are any of these top-secret platforms nuclear-powered?
And if all of this sounds too crazy, is it any stranger than space aliens traveling trillions of miles from another solar system, only to crash land or inexplicably hang out over U.S. military facilities?
Fascinating story in the New York Times on Friday, May 17, 2024.
For me, two of the most important points are that the Pentagon expects to deploy major space weapons in Earth orbit by 2026 and spending in this area could be hundreds of millions of dollars annually but no one outside of government knows this with certainty.
It’s also telling that Gen. Saltzman canceled his interview with the Times reporter after aides to the general were told that he “would be asked about specific warfighting tools.”
So, I guess we can assume “warfighting tools” is code for secret space weapons.
So, I’ve been reading all the criticism about Exodus Propulsion Technologies’ claims of discovering a new force for propulsion that promises to usher in a revolutionary transportation method for space travel, and I remember thinking, “You know, what’s needed here are some videos from the laboratory showing this force in action.”
Well, now some videos have been posted on the company website, and they are quite interesting.
What they show are test devices that evidently are suspended with wires and rotated via some kind of electrical force that does not appear to be ionic wind.
Anyway, what if the Pentagon is way ahead of the private sector in this area? What if many UFO sightings over the decades have been the result of an advanced propulsion technology that only the U.S. military has?
Interesting Fox News Digital interview with Rep. Tim Burchett regarding his ongoing attempts to learn the truth about UFOs. There could be a reality miniseries here!
Anyway, I think he has pretty much nailed it when he says the Pentagon is using subterfuge to conceal the true nature of this phenomenon, not necessarily because there’s an extraterrestrial origin, but because of extreme secrecy surrounding military programs.
Obviously, Rep. Burchett has chosen to focus his ire on government spending because that’s his political leaning, and it’s certainly true that there’s a considerable “black budget” that conceals spending from the public.
I would argue, though, that there’s something a lot more interesting and intriguing going on here: Not the spending per se, but specifically how this funding is related to UFOs. A very compelling hypothesis is that the Pentagon is concealing technological breakthroughs that are so unconventional they could easily be mistaken for extraterrestrial.
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, former head of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), has alluded to this possibility in his writings and statements, and so has AARO’s official UFO report that reviews sightings and encounters going back to 1945.
Both sources have unequivocally stated that witnesses, including members of the military, have unwittingly observed top-secret technologies and have mistaken these systems for extraterrestrial visitation.
From the report: “AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentification of never-before-seen experimental and operational space, rocket, and air systems, including stealth technologies and the proliferation of drone platforms.”
Dr. Kirkpatrick has also issued stern warnings to members of Congress not to use the search for E.T. as an excuse to expose top-secret weapons. From his recent opinion piece published in Scientific American (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/we-need-to-investigate-ufos-but-without-the-distraction-of-conspiracy/): “There also is the possibility that some observed and reported phenomena are associated with past or ongoing national security programs completely unrelated to extraterrestrials. Unfortunately, some who have been peripherally involved in these programs are taking advantage of the lack of understanding of security compartmentalization among the public—and some members of Congress—and feel that exposure of national security activities is a public right.
The harm of such exposure would be incalculable: billions of dollars and decades invested in military capabilities exposed to our potential adversaries to satisfy ill-informed curiosity. While some staffers and members of Congress may claim that they and the American people have a right to know of every classified research program, Congress already has an established process for notification of sensitive programs to the bipartisan leadership of both the Senate and House as well as the chairs and ranking minority members of the Senate and House intelligence committees, often referred to as the Gang of Eight. It is incumbent on both the speaker of the House, the Senate majority leader and both chairs of the intelligence committees to ensure that there is no risk of exposing any national security programs in a rush to find extraterrestrials, and that documents are reviewed within appropriate channels. If these members of Congress deem it appropriate not to share classified information, they are doing their job. These are not town hall topics.”
Notice that he says “billions of dollars and decades invested in military capabilities … ”
So, herein lies the true nature of the entire UFO saga in this country going all the way back to 1947: Learning the truth about UFOs would mean revealing the existence of top-secret weapons.
Logically, then, this would suggest that a whole bizarre inventory of encounters involving U.S. military personnel have always been top-secret Pentagon technologies known only to a small circle with a “need to know.” Everything from those UFOs that disabled nuclear missile launch systems back in the 1960s, to the Tic Tac encounters with U.S. Navy pilots in 2004.
Moreover, the performance characteristics of these objects were such that there is one clear, overarching likelihood suggested by this historical record of sightings: The Pentagon has developed exotic and highly unconventional propulsion systems that it has hidden from the public all these years.
This “terrestrial hypothesis” for UFOs leads to many follow-up questions and concerns, chief among them: Is there a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force that is far more capable than either of those entities? If so, how far have we gone? Do we have military bases in deep space? Are any of these top-secret platforms nuclear-powered?
Thanks to Rep. Burchett and his colleagues for their efforts and Fox News Digital for the interview.
This snippet from The Hill article is most relevant, in brackets and bolded:
[Following a classified briefing on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), more commonly known as UFOs, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) suggested Wednesday that the U.S. government may be intentionally concealing information on these objects from the American public.
“I think there’s a cover up,” Burchett told Blake Burman on NewsNation’s “The Hill.”]
I wholeheartedly agree with Rep. Burchett: There is a HUGE coverup.
However, it has absolutely nothing to do with E.T. and everything to do with Pentagon secrecy about propulsion breakthroughs going back decades. All the evidence I’ve seen strongly suggests the UFOs are top-secret U.S. weapons, particularly the most sensational ones like the Tic Tac encountered by U.S. Navy pilots in 2004 over a U.S. military training range.
The Pentagon’s recent UFO report pretty much confirms as much, explicitly spelling out that UFO witnesses have unwittingly observed top-secret weapons and that they misidentified these technologies as extraterrestrial. The report also makes clear that public discussion of these programs would seriously damage national security.
Here are some excerpts from the UFO report that demonstrate these facts, bulleted, bolded and in brackets:
[• AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentification of never-before-seen experimental and operational space, rocket, and air systems, including stealth technologies and the proliferation of drone platforms.
• AARO concludes many of these programs represent authentic, current and former sensitive, national security programs, but none of these programs have been involved with capturing, recovering, or reverse-engineering off-world technology or material.
• In many cases, the interviewees named authentic USG (U.S. government) classified programs well-known and understood to those appropriately accessed to them in the Executive Branch and Legislative Branch; however, the interviewees mistakenly associated these authentic USG programs with alien and extraterrestrialactivity.
• AARO assesses that all of the named and described alleged hidden UAP reverse-engineering programs provided by interviewees either do not exist; are misidentified authentic, highly-sensitive national security programs that are not related to extraterrestrial technology exploitation
• The interviewees and others who have mistakenly associated authentic sensitive national security programs with UAP had incomplete or unauthorized access to these programs; discussion of these programs outside of secure facilities presents a high risk of exposing national security information.]
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, former head of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), has also reinforced these assertions in two opinion pieces published in Scientific American.
[There also is the possibility that some observed and reported phenomena are associated with past or ongoing national security programs completely unrelated to extraterrestrials. Unfortunately, some who have been peripherally involved in these programs are taking advantage of the lack of understanding of security compartmentalization among the public—and some members of Congress—and feel that exposure of national security activities is a public right.
The harm of such exposure would be incalculable: billions of dollars and decades invested in military capabilities exposed to our potential adversaries to satisfy ill-informed curiosity. While some staffers and members of Congress may claim that they and the American people have a right to know of every classified research program, Congress already has an established process for notification of sensitive programs to the bipartisan leadership of both the Senate and House as well as the chairs and ranking minority members of the Senate and House intelligence committees, often referred to as the Gang of Eight. It is incumbent on both the speaker of the House, the Senate majority leader and both chairs of the intelligence committees to ensure that there is no risk of exposing any national security programs in a rush to find extraterrestrials, and that documents are reviewed within appropriate channels. If these members of Congress deem it appropriate not to share classified information, they are doing their job. These are not town hall topics.]
It’s worth noting that there is plenty of precedent for quantum leaps in military technology going all the way back to the ancient Sumerians and Greeks, astonishing breakthroughs held in extreme secrecy for decades.
There is, however, NO precedent for E.T. visitation.
I would argue that when you consider the historical pattern of UFO encounters beginning in 1947 that the U.S. has had some form of electric or electromagnetic field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since then. If this is true, then these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s “black budget,” keeping them hidden from the public.
I would further propose that if this is true, then it is the most profound military conspiracy in history, far surpassing everything from the Trojan Horse to the Manhattan Project. A secret of such magnitude that if revealed would have huge implications not only for the world economy but for the very trajectory of human civilization.
So, I would submit that if you remove E.T. visitation from the equation, the only logical explanation is that the Pentagon has very likely developed a series of propulsion breakthroughs that have been responsible for, but not limited to:
• Kenneth Arnold’s seminal sighting in 1947
• The UFOs over Washington, D.C., in 1952
• The UFO that crashed in Kecksburg, Pennsylvania, in 1965
• The giant triangular UFO seen over the Hudson Valley and Belgium in the 1980s
• The giant triangular object over Phoenix, Arizona, in 1997
• The similarly giant triangular or delta-shape object observed over southern Illinois in 2000
• The Tic Tac-shape object encountered by U.S. Navy pilots in 2004
• The disc-shape object observed over Chicago O’Hare International Airport in 2006
As to why the Pentagon would be operating these weapons over populated areas, perhaps it’s real-world training, a “living lab” to perfect tactics and to study how well they perform against state-of-the-art, white-world technologies like F-16s. There have been examples of mysterious military training exercises taking place over populated areas. This excellent article in The War Zone documents one such exercise over Los Angeles (https://www.twz.com/38753/those-mysterious-gray-helicopters-were-landing-on-multiple-downtown-la-rooftops-last-night).
So, if this terrestrial hypothesis for UFOs is correct and the Pentagon has made a series of astonishing propulsion breakthroughs – something akin to antigravity – then this raises a whole host of follow-up concerns and questions. For example, do we have a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force? If so, do we have military bases in deep space?
Thanks to Rep. Burchett and his colleagues for pursuing this matter. Thanks to The Hill for covering the briefing.
Emil Venere 