These two recent articles provide an excuse to bring up the relatively recent phenomenon of so-called fireball UFOs … reported frequently to the NUFORC and other organizations.

Some of these reports could be evidence of an advanced, above-top-secret propulsion system developed by the U.S. military.

Anyway, two plasma-related articles (links below) are of potential UFO significance. In one, British tabloids are reporting that a shadowy London-based UFO-investigation unit formed by the MoD has been virtually taken over by the Pentagon. The article quotes Nick Pope, who suggests that “atmospheric plasmas” could help explain the UFO phenomenon while potentially aiding military development of space weapons and lasers.

True to the sleazy, slipshod journalism of the tabloid industry, the article lacks information, is light on attribution and is of dubious credibility.

In other words, you can’t get enough of this stuff!

In the second article, PBS ponderously reports on research to develop “plasma wings” for aircraft, a startling innovation that could revolutionize aviation technology.

https://www.rt.com/uk/359057-pentagon-ufo-hunters-soho/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/space/plasma-air-control/

Both articles remind me of a potential conspiracy, which, if true, would constitute a profoundly game-changing phenomenon: that the U.S. military has developed electric field propulsion related to this “plasma magic” business.

And, did I mention, it’s all in Flying Saucers!

Hmmm… must be swamp gas … metallic, disc-shaped swamp gas … right …

http://news.co.cr/best-ufo-photo-in-the-world-taken-at-arenal-costa-rica-45-yrs-ago/50584/

Actually, this provides an excuse to discuss the phenomenon of USOs, or unidentified submerged objects …

And, did I mention, this is a subject touched upon in Flying Saucers!

This just in … some retired cop is going to get to the bottom of what happened at Rendlesham … right … sure he is …

He wonders how the startling events there could have been of no “acute defence significance” to the military.

Well, I can think of one obvious reason …

If he really intends to investigate this event, he might want to start by parsing the real information (testimony from base commander Halt) from the totally specious disinformation from Penniston, who claims to have had telepathic messaging from aliens.

The enduring Rendlesham Forest phenomenon goes hand-in-hand with a long history of similar of encounters.

It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Links to articles below.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1711518/retired-cop-calls-on-government-to-reveal-truth-on-infamous-rendlesham-forest-ufo-incident/

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/542773/rendlesham-forest-incident-ufos-roswell-mod-charles-holt-gary-heseltine

http://www.news.com.au/technology/science/space/retired-cop-calls-on-government-to-reveal-truth-on-infamous-rendlesham-forest-ufo-incident/news-story/d02a4fdd09c0b54c9f576f4acfff6fea

Also breaking!

Astrophysicists fear collisions with dust could damage spacecraft traveling to our nearest stellar neighbor, Alpha Centauri.

http://www.sciencealert.com/our-mission-to-alpha-centauri-could-be-jeopardised-by-dust-collisions

Ah, but not with Big Black Delta’s game-changing hyperdrive propulsion system!

It’s all in Flying Saucers.

Breaking news!

http://www.space.com/33834-discovery-of-planet-proxima-b.html

A potential earth-like planet has been detected orbiting the sun’s nearest stellar neighbor.

But Big Black Delta’s already been to Alpha Centauri and discovered not one but two thriving worlds that support a variety of ecosystems and habitats.

It’s all in Flying Saucers!

This day in history … Aug. 23, 1974, John Lennon and his girlfriend see a classic flying saucer whizzing around his New York apartment building, the United Nations and the East River.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/540174/john-lennon-ufo-sighting-new-york-revelation-beatles-mary-peng

I find it interesting that the saucer returned later … This just seems like the feds running surveillance on Lennon, deemed a socialist threat, just as we spied on Martin Luther King and numerous public figures. No aliens here … just Uncle Sam up to his old tricks.

I also find it interesting that others evidently saw the saucer and reported it to the police.

You have to admit it’s brilliant. The media don’t have the slightest idea how to report on this story, which is obviously a very important encounter and provides a tantalizing clue as to the origin and purpose of flying saucers.

This just in from the tabloid press. Essentially it’s the same vague article in three different tabloids, supposedly crafted by three different writers.

Here is one link. http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/701005/The-mystery-unmarked-passenger-jets-used-to-fly-men-in-black-into-alien-base-Area-51

Anyway, the gist is this: Yes, there is a fleet of mysterious airliners flying regularly into Area 51 to ferry workers into the base. It’s an old story, and unfortunately these tabloid offerings provide nothing new. However, at least the tabloids periodically publish stories on the subject, which you can’t say about more legitimate media sources.

One interesting note: Nick Pope, former UFO investigator from the UK’s Ministry of Defence, says there is no evidence of aliens.

“Sadly, despite the rumours, I’ve seen no evidence that we’ve recovered any extraterrestrial technology.”

Bingo!

He also acknowledges that Area 51 is “… where various secret prototype aircraft and drones are developed and test flown.”

So, the UK’s Fox Mulder gets kudos for stating the obvious … but he also gets demerits for failing to take the next step: yes, there is likely NO space alien connection to the above-top-secret military base. And yes, there are secret prototypes … so, the implication is that these secret prototypes are themselves the source of many UFO reports over the years.

This is a logical increment, not some fanciful leap. UFOs exist. Hence, many of these UFOs are a product of the U.S. military.

The question I have is, how can there be different bylines for the exact same story in three different publications?

The other two links:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1627413/area-51-mystery-as-huge-unmarked-passenger-planes-are-spotted-flying-from-las-vegas-airport-to-the-top-secret-military-base-sparking-conspiracy-theories/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-3744704/Pictured-mysterious-unmarked-passenger-jets-fly-Las-Vegas-America-s-secret-military-base-Area-51.html

This was just posted (link below) on the National UFO Reporting Center Web site, and it calls to mind an interesting tidbit from Flying Saucers.

http://nuforc.org/webreports/128/S128388.html

The phenomenon of flying saucers shadowing missile launches at military bases and hovering over nuclear missile silos to deactivate the electronic controls has been extensively documented in the literature. (Re: the compelling accounts of Air Force Capt. Robert Salas and others)

However, it’s obvious that everyone has overlooked the only logical explanation: the Pentagon’s testing of flying saucers as the ultimate anti-missile platform.

C’mon, Davenport, get it together, dude.

This is a no-brainer, people. It’s all in Flying Saucers.

In a new article published in the Epoch Times quoting Nick Pope, he confides that investigators concluded a secret military prototype was the only remotely plausible non-ET explanation for the famous Rendlesham Forest Incident.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2113207-former-uk-defense-official-discusses-real-life-x-files/

Epoch Times: Aside from the heiroglyphs seen by one of the witnesses, are there any other aspects of this incident that absolutely could not be attributed to secret high-tech human operations?

Pope: Indeed, I can’t entirely rule out the possibility that what was involved at Rendlesham was a secret prototype aircraft or drone of some sort. I think it’s highly unlikely, given the details, and indeed this possibility was checked by both the MoD and the USAF.

I can’t entirely rule out the possibility that what was involved at Rendlesham was a secret prototype aircraft or drone of some sort.

— Nick Pope, former UK Ministry of Defence official

But one cannot completely discount the possibility of a secret project unknown even to those of us in government charged with investigating this incident. Of all the skeptical theories put forward over the years it’s the only one we assessed as being remotely possible.

Don’t you hate the cheesy “under the radar” wording in the headline? I guess they couldn’t resist.

But at least they are finally giving the B-21 bomber story some cursory coverage

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/b-21-stealth-bomber-cost-secrecy/index.html

It’s really sort of hilarious that people consider that silly artist’s concept drawing to be a fair representation of the super-secret bomber in any way, shape or form.

From the CNN article: “The Pentagon also made public an artist’s conception of the aircraft, which some lawmakers argue would be more useful to a foreign intelligence agency than the overall contract cost.”

 It should be fairly obvious that the alleged concept image is a ruse.

Officials have already acknowledged that they have completed extensive wind-tunnel tests of the bomber. They know what it looks like “down to the access panels” … and may have even test flown a full-scale prototype by now.