#gillibrand

@RepEricBurlison is so correct! The UFOs are likely ‘manmade’ …

It’s always refreshing when you read about a prominent, influential person who isn’t fully ensconced in the ridiculous ET hypothesis that dominates the whole national conversation about UFOs.

Burlison on UFO’s: ‘They’re either angels or man-made’

Here, we see a U.S. representative endorsing the terrestrial hypothesis, and thank goodness for that!

So, assuming the UFOs are of terrestrial making and taking that line of reasoning a step further, I would say the observational evidence supports the idea that the Pentagon has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. At this point, with absolutely NO direct evidence supporting the space-alien hypothesis, you have to at least ponder this possibility, especially when you consider the burgeoning military “black budget” year after year after year going back decades, shrouding various programs in complete secrecy, hidden from Congress, the executive branch, and the public.

So, if, for example, the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots on a U.S. military training range isn’t ET, then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics — perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” being investigated by physicists — which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces generated by traditional chemical propulsion systems. We might also speculate that some of the vehicles observed are possibly nuclear-powered platforms. Anyway, these vehicles appear to be well beyond the testing phase, but are actually in operation, which is perhaps why they are seen over military training ranges.

Also recently, U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has made some VERY intriguing comments that appear to suggest that some of the UFOs encountered by Navy pilots could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated entirely without congressional oversight.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

Information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a “need to know” only, Gillibrand said.  She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding current secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project. The senator appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, fearing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

(Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions that said including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So, there is a lot of fear. So, I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”)

You know my opinion: It was never ET. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in the 1960s when pilots were reporting UFOs after seeing flights of the U-2 and SR-71, and it is today as well. Based on witness testimony, the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. Call it antigravity, if you like. I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to Kenneth Arnold’s seminal sighting in 1947 that the U.S. has had some form of field propulsion technology either in development or in operation at least since then. If this is true, then these systems have been evolving completely in the dark for more than 70 years!

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just cynically profiting off the space-alien hype.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like David Grusch, and likely involves the fabrication of fake data and bogus documents. After all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Speaking about UFOs, Sen. Gillibrand invokes Manhattan Project to describe secrecy surrounding Pentagon programs, citing ‘under penalty of death’ language in non-disclosure agreements

Ok, so, in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand seems to suggest that some of the UFOs encountered by U.S. Navy pilots could be top secret Pentagon weapons that Congress hasn’t been “read in on.” As such, she said, information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a “need to know” only, which excludes Congress and the public.  

https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html

She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding “secret access programs” to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb. Gillibrand appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may literally be afraid to come forward, fearing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Anyway, here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions … including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So there is a lot of fear. So I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”

Sen. Gillibrand seems to be alluding to a conflict between Congress and the Pentagon, with the Pentagon restricting access to information that is directly related to UFO sightings.

You know my opinion: It was never ET. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in the 1960s when pilots were reporting flights of the U-2 and SR-71 as UFOs, and it is today as well. Based on witness testimony, the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough – call it antigravity, if you like – which is unknown to Congress and to the executive branch. However, the Pentagon can’t admit that it has antigravity because, well, then it would no longer be secret. It all makes perfect sense, in a convoluted kind of way.

 But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Re: UFOs and secret Pentagon programs: ‘We do not want to be misled. We do not want to be led astray.’

In the following response to a reporter’s inquiry, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand uses some VERY interesting language regarding Congress’s quest for the truth about UFOs.

Here is the brief exchange published Aug. 8 in City & State New York, which covers New York politics and policy. (The full article is here: https://www.cityandstateny.com/personality/2023/08/kirsten-gillibrand-wants-know-truth-about-aliens/389198/)

Reporter: I understand you helped secure full funding for AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office) this year, but do you feel like the U.S. is doing enough to research and review unidentified anomalous phenomena incidents?

Sen. Gillibrand: I think this AARO office is excellent and built to do this job. If there are special access programs – they are called SAP programs – that Congress was not read in on, we put an amendment in the defense bill to say they can’t be funded. We do not want to be misled. We do not want to be led astray. We want to get to the bottom of this and this office is perfectly positioned to do that work.

Well, alright, the senator’s a player!

It stands to reason that she wouldn’t have said “We do not want to be misled …” unless she thought there was at least a possibility that Congress was being misled and led astray. It also would appear that members of Congress are FINALLY coming to terms with the fact that the Pentagon is not telling the whole truth about UFOs and that some of these objects are likely top secret U.S. military weapons that are unknown to the public.

You know my opinion: It has always been the Pentagon, it has never been extraterrestrials. 

Here, in a recent opinion piece appearing in The Hill, the writer has hit on a HUGE issue.

From the piece: “Either the U.S. government has mounted an extraordinary, decades-long coverup of UFO retrieval and reverse-engineering activities, or elements of the defense and intelligence establishment are engaging in a staggeringly brazen psychological disinformation campaign.”

A monumental UFO scandal is looming

I vote “staggeringly brazen psychological disinformation campaign.”

The main purpose of disinformation is to hide something. I contend that something is a series of propulsion breakthroughs that, if commercialized, would literally change the trajectory of human civilization. These are advances conjured up entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!

So, along those lines, if the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots isn’t ET, then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics, perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” being investigated by physicists, which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces caused by traditional chemical propulsion systems. We are talking instantaneous acceleration.

I also contend that the U.S. has had some form of antigravity or field propulsion technology either in development or in operation going all the way back to the immediate postwar period and that these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s burgeoning “black budget.” As such, the existence of these systems is hidden from Congress, the executive branch and the public.

Perhaps the last president to have direct knowledge was Ike, but I digress …

Meanwhile, a decades-long disinformation campaign has been engineered to make people think the UFOs are ET because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the rhetorical quagmire of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s ET.

It’s really a brilliant approach, one that has fooled even technical experts like David Grusch. Because, after all, if the people constructing the disinformation are just as smart as the marks, it can be very effective.

And if you don’t think the Pentagon’s disinformation machinery is working perfectly, ask yourself, what are we talking about? Are we talking about whether the Pentagon might have achieved a quantum leap in propulsion technology, an advance so profound that it promises to usher in a radical new means of transportation and enable the practical colonization of space? No. We are asking whimsical questions about space aliens, time travel, interdimensional beings, and various ‘Are we alone?’ scenarios.

No one suspects that it’s all been engineered to be that way.

Do you think Mr. Grusch just woke up one day and said, oh, I know, it’s ET?

No, he was fed a diet of high-octane, professional-grade disinformation, likely with fake documents and fake data. Whatever it was, it was good enough to impress Grusch, who is no doubt a very intelligent, very educated person.

And it all fits nicely into a legacy of UFO disinformation going all the way back to 1952, when, I contend, President Truman arranged for a flyover of the experimental antigravity vehicles, much as he had ordered a similar demonstration of the flying wing aircraft, which flew over the White House in 1949.

After the 1952 UFO flap, generals quelled public concerns during a press conference, declaring that an atmospheric phenomenon called a “temperature inversion” caused radar blips mistaken for UFOs. Unfortunately, these objects also were observed visually. At any rate, it was a sham, but the media ate it up, setting the stage for what would follow: a seventy-year-long disinformation conspiracy surrounding UFOs.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

How Much Longer is the U.S. Congress Going to Engage in this UFO Charade with the Pentagon?

Ok, so the Pentagon is underfunding the office that was created to allegedly investigate UFOs and to increase transparency over the issue.

https://www.rdrnews.com/news/national/senate-holding-new-hearings-on-uaps-april-19/article_3cace3fe-d957-11ed-b1ec-935873a47452.html

A cynic might say this lack of funding is BY DESIGN.

Why?

Because many, if not all, of the most exotic UFOs encountered by Navy and commercial pilots are above-top-secret U.S. weapons based on a revolutionary propulsion system. A system, or, more likely, a collection of innovations so secret they are unknown even to the military pilots who encounter these weapons.

Therefore, the Pentagon can’t really investigate the UFOs without exposing these top-secret weapons. Disclosing said weapons would mean they would no longer be, well, secret.

So, in yet another pointless hearing, on April 19, we’re going to watch the spectacle of U.S. senators engage in this ridiculous, futile exercise that’s supposed to finally get to the bottom of the mysterious and ongoing UFO saga in this country.

ENOUGH!

Unless your goal is to wade through reams of disinformation and folderol deliberately intended to confuse the public, then just stop.

Now, if Congress really wants to learn the truth then it needs to commission a completely independent study, staffed NOT by the Pentagon or ANY branch of our government, but by a private group of investigators.

And please don’t staff this effort with UFO activists like Leslie Kean, Luis Elizondo, Christopher Mellon and the Ancient Aliens crew, who are fully ensconced in the ET hypothesis and therefore can’t effectively investigate this vital issue.

I say this issue is vital because if the U.S. military does, in fact, possess a propulsion system capable of the performance witnessed by Navy pilots, then that means we are truly able to travel to the stars. Furthermore, that would mean the U.S. military is hoarding innovations that would greatly benefit the world.

And this has likely been going on FOR DECADES!

So, Sens. Gillibrand and Rubio: Please stop engaging in this pretense of investigations into UFOs.

Note to Sens. Gillibrand, Rubio: The Pentagon Can’t Investigate the UFOs Because the UFOs are the Pentagon’s

You really have to laugh at the absurd Möbius strip of disinformation and subterfuge that is the Pentagon’s alleged newfound interest in finally getting to the bottom of the enduring UFO mystery.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2023/03/31/congress-requests-more-funds-for-pentagon-ufo-office-in-budget-request/

Dear Sens. Gillibrand and Rubio: I can see that you are dismayed by the lack of financial support for the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, founded by Congress to learn the truth.

Unfortunately, here’s the truth: The Pentagon can’t investigate the UFOs because the most sensational ones, the Tic Tacs, the flying discs, the triangles, are above-top-secret Pentagon weapons unknown to all but a very compartmentalized inner circle.

This would mean that Congress, the public, the executive branch, etc., etc., even the Navy pilots who encountered these objects, don’t have a need to know.

And now we see that even the AARO budget is top secret. So much for transparency, eh? Even the office tasked with uncovering the truth about UFOs is operating within the black budget!

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you didn’t already know. It’s all in Flying Saucers!