#nasa

What if NASA can’t tell the truth about UFOs because the UFOs are top-secret U.S. weapons, and that’s classified?

NASA’s big UFO report released Thursday (Sept. 14, 2023) only reinforces my feeling that the nation’s space agency can’t tell the truth about UFOs because the UFOs are the Pentagon’s, meaning they are classified and out of reach.

In short, NASA doesn’t have a “need to know.”

So, all we’re going to learn from NASA reports will be endless minutia about mundane things like drones, satellites, astronomical and atmospheric phenomena, rocket launches that are mistaken for E.T., and bla, bla, bla.

This is because none of the UFOs are extraterrestrial. So, NASA cannot find any E.T. causality.

Upon surveying the extensive, if one-dimensional, coverage about the NASA report and presser, I found a quote from NASA Administrator Bill Nelson to be especially pertinent: “The NASA independent study team did not find any evidence that UAP have an extraterrestrial origin, but we don’t know what these UAP are …”

Meanwhile, we obviously have someone at the Pentagon feeding disinformation to people like whistleblower David Grusch. The main purpose of disinformation is to hide something. I contend that “something” is a propulsion breakthrough that, if commercialized, promises to literally change the trajectory of human civilization. This is a monumental advance conjured up entirely by Homo sapiens, the same species that has brought us nukes, microchips, lasers, microwave ovens, skyscrapers, the Mona Lisa, etc., etc., … no assist from space aliens needed!

So, along those lines, if, for example, the so-called Tic Tac vehicle observed by Navy pilots isn’t E.T., then it’s the Pentagon. Theory would suggest that a vehicle exhibiting that kind of performance is tapping into a different kind of physics — perhaps the much-speculated “fifth force” now being investigated by physicists — which wouldn’t necessarily subject its pilots to the same crushing g-forces caused by traditional chemical propulsion systems.

U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., has recently made some VERY intriguing comments that appear to support the idea that some of the UFOs encountered by Navy pilots could be the product of “secret access programs” developed and operated entirely in the dark without the knowledge of Congress or the executive branch.

(Her comments can be heard in this video recorded Aug. 14, 2023, by The Post-Star newspaper in Glens Falls, N.Y., https://poststar.com/u-s-sen-kirsten-gillibrand-discusses-uaps/video_a1403028-3adc-11ee-95e2-6f6281509e11.html)

In essence, Sen. Gillibrand said information about these weapons could be restricted to those with a need to know only, which would exclude Congress, and I presume, NASA.  She also, VERY interestingly, compares the covertness surrounding secret access programs to extreme measures taken during the Manhattan Project to build the first atomic bomb. The senator appears to be saying that potential whistleblowers may be literally afraid to come forward, citing “under penalty of death” language in non-disclosure agreements.

Here is a segment that I transcribed from the video posted by The Post-Star newspaper:

Gillibrand: “So, Oppenheimer is about developing the bomb during World War II. And all those scientists who worked on that project had to sign non-disclosure agreements. And what I’ve heard about those non-disclosure agreements is that because it was wartime it had provisions that said including if you disclose under penalty of death.  And so the big worry is that the people who signed non-disclosure agreements to work on any type of program for the military that it had language in there that made them think that that was true. So, there is a lot of fear.

So, I don’t know if we’ll ever get to the bottom of it. I don’t know if we’ll ever get the information about special access programs that are need-to-know only, that Congress is not read in on. I’m trying to get to the bottom of it. I put a provision in the defense bill this year that said you can’t fund any special access programs if you don’t go through Congress …”

Sen. Gillibrand seems to be alluding to a conflict between Congress and the Pentagon, with the Pentagon restricting access to information that is directly related to UFO sightings.

You know my opinion: It was never E.T. It was always Uncle Sam. It was Uncle Sam back in 1947 when Kenneth Arnold spotted a squadron of UFOs near Mount Rainier; during the flying saucer scare of 1952 over Washington, D.C., when President Harry Truman likely ordered a demonstration of these weapons much as he had arranged a similar demonstration of the flying wing in 1949, when the aircraft flew low over the capital; during the 1960s when startled pilots were reporting UFOs after unwittingly observing flights of the top-secret U-2 and SR-71; also during the 1960s at U.S. nuclear missile facilities, when, I propose, the military was testing a secret anti-missile technology capable of temporarily disabling the rocket launch systems; in the 1980s over the Hudson Valley when bystanders including police officers saw a huge triangular thing floating overhead; in Belgium when numerous credible witnesses saw the same sort of craft; and in 1997 over Phoenix, Ariz.; and again in 2000 over rural Illinois, when a raft of cops observed a similar delta-shape craft; then, in 2006 when employees at Chicago O’Hare saw a stealthy disc hovering overhead and abruptly shooting straight up at high speed, punching a hole in the cloud cover that lingered afterward; and, of course, in the various encounters recently described by U.S. Navy pilots.

Based on witness testimony, the Pentagon evidently has achieved a propulsion breakthrough – call it antigravity, if you like – which is unknown to Congress. However, the Pentagon can’t admit that it has antigravity because, well, then it would no longer be secret. It all makes perfect sense, in a convoluted kind of way.

I would argue that when you consider the pattern of UFO encounters going all the way back to 1947 that the U.S. has had some form of antigravity or field propulsion technology either in development or in operation since then. If this is true, then these systems have evolved entirely within the Pentagon’s “black budget,” keeping them hidden from Congress, the executive branch and the public.

At the same time, there appears to be an ongoing disinformation program to make people think the UFOs are E.T. because as soon as you entangle the entire subject within the intellectual morass of space aliens you relegate the whole story to the fringe. The public and the media don’t take it seriously. The only people who do take it seriously are those who are already convinced that it’s extraterrestrials or are just making money off of the E.T. hypothesis.

So, if this alternative view is correct – let’s call it the terrestrial hypothesis – and the Pentagon does, indeed, have antigravity, this raises a whole host of follow-up concerns and questions, including:

  • Do we have a shadow space program that runs parallel to NASA and the Space Force? If so, do we have military bases in deep space?
  • When the SR-71 blackbird was retired in 1990, was it replaced with another, more advanced platform capable of reaching any destination in the world quickly and on short notice, or was it simply superseded by satellites and UAVs, as is conventional wisdom?  
  • In addition to antigravity, have we developed a propulsion system that harnesses the Casimir effect? This might explain the incredible performance observed by police officers in southern Illinois in 2000. At least one of the officers said the ship darted from place to place, instantly leaping several miles at a time.
  • If we have developed such a propulsion system, have we gone interstellar?    

Of course, in exploring the terrestrial hypothesis there are many additional potential questions you could pose.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already pondered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

Are the latest revelations about crashed alien craft just more of the same disinformation the Pentagon has been feeding the public for years?

Well, call me a cynic, but to me this just looks like more of the same disinformation the Pentagon has been feeding the public for years, and Grusch is just too naive to see it for what it is.

Military whistleblower claims US has UFO retrieval program

Why, you ask, would the Pentagon be feeding us all disinformation about UFOs?

The answer is so simple: To confuse the media and to relegate the story to the fringes so that the public doesn’t catch on that the Pentagon has a breakthrough propulsion system, brought to us not by ET but by the same geniuses who have brought us everything from nuclear weapons to lasers, microchips to microwave ovens.

But, hey, I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already entertained. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

It seems absurd that ET wouldn’t know how to land after mastering the intricacies of interstellar travel

Ok, so I remain extremely skeptical about the idea that ET, after perfecting the considerably complex task of interstellar travel, would not know how to land.

So, what do we make of all this talk of crashed ET UFOs and alleged reverse-engineered tech? Are all the media missing something major here?

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/06/03/ufo-crash-materials-intelligence-00100077

To me is seems like people are confusing two things: black projects that are entirely shrouded from the public and Congress, and alleged ET visitations.

I would argue that just because we have black projects that may seem to be out of this world, that doesn’t mean they are literally out of this world.

I would also argue that human beings are perfectly capable of engineering seemingly impossible technologies. To name a few, nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, lasers, microchips, nanochips, AI. We didn’t need space aliens to make the breakthroughs that resulted in these advances, so why do we assume we would need help from ET to design antigravity propulsion?

It would appear that the Pentagon has achieved a huge breakthrough, or perhaps a collection of breakthroughs, in the propulsion arena.

But I’m not telling you anything you haven’t already seriously considered. It’s all in Flying Saucers!

NASA is returning to the Moon, but has the Pentagon’s secret space program already gone interstellar?

Some five decades after planting an American flag on the lunar surface, NASA is returning to the Moon, and with much anticipation. Space.com explains:  

https://www.space.com/artemis-1-moon-mission-nasa-zero-hour-preview

But has the Pentagon’s shadow space program already reached Alpha Centauri and beyond, in an unprecedented military conspiracy spanning decades?

Let’s consider the following:

  1. It should be obvious by now that someone has achieved a propulsion breakthrough. U.S. Navy pilots have witnessed aviation platforms capable of astonishing performance, and commercial pilots also have reported encounters. These objects have been directly observed on U.S. military training ranges and also tracked by radar. There is no doubt that they do exist.
  2. It could be space aliens, or it could be earthlings. Up to this point, the ET hypothesis has dominated the conversation about UFOs. Just for the sake of argument, however, let’s consider the terrestrial hypothesis: that UFOs are super advanced technology developed right here on planet earth, brought to you by the same species that created things like nuclear weapons, microelectronics, nanoelectronics, lasers, fiberoptics, quantum computers, etc., etc.
  3. Then, following this line of reasoning, the nation most likely to have achieved this propulsion breakthrough over the past fifty years is the United States, given the unparalleled resources pumped year after year into military technology during the postwar period.
  4. Also, let us acknowledge that it is highly unlikely that the U.S. military would cede the conquest of space to the nation’s largely civilian space agency, NASA, especially when you consider that space represents the most profoundly important future military theater. Rather, if the Pentagon did possess an advanced propulsion system unlike anything else on the planet, it would secretly continue to exploit this fantastic strategic advantage, pushing farther into space while it enjoyed this temporary dominance over its adversaries.
  5. The Pentagon does not share information about its secret weapons with anyone, certainly not a secret of this magnitude. It would be a military conspiracy rivaled in modern history only by the Manhattan Project. Congress would simply not have a “need to know,” even in the face of the current investigations into UFOs. Knowledge of this new propulsion system would be strictly off limits to the public. Period.

So, this leaves us with a highly dysfunctional system in which commercial access and benefit to the general public are severely hampered by extreme secrecy. A system where NASA is struggling to return astronauts to the Moon half a century after achieving that feat, yet, unbeknownst to Congress and the executive branch, the military has made a quantum leap in space travel. A system in which the Pentagon has been charged by Congress to investigate UFOs, while this very same Congress is unaware that the UFOs are top secret U.S. weapons. The Pentagon can’t explain to Congress that the UFOs are secret U.S. weapons systems because then they would no longer be secret.

This scenario presents several absurdities. First, how can the Pentagon investigate UFOs when the UFOs are top secret U.S. military platforms? Second, you have two parallel space programs, one saddled with the severe limitations of chemical propulsion. The other, already operating vehicles capable of astonishing performance that can travel with equal proficiency in the atmosphere, under the oceans and in outer space.

Let’s assume the conspiracy began in the aftermath of World War II. That’s when the initial propulsion breakthrough becomes evident, with several key sightings: Kenneth Arnold’s encounter in 1947 and the 1952 UFO flap in Washington, D.C.

That means the conspiracy would be 75 years running!

Astronomers in Ukraine Detect, Measure UFOs in Broad Daylight over Kyiv

Ok, let’s just say it. This story is insane!

https://www.livescience.com/ukraine-ufo-uap-report

You have astronomers in the Ukraine detecting UFOs using specialized equipment intended for the study of meteors. The astronomers have not only categorized different types of UFOs, but also calculated their speeds.

The results are bonkers: UFOs, some traveling solo, others in “squadrons” and moving at speeds of 33,000 mph!

So, one of my big takeaways is that these observations were performed in broad daylight. This means the objects are traveling so fast the human eye and ordinary photographic equipment will not capture them. Doesn’t this also mean such UFOs could be flying all over the place, right over our heads, and we wouldn’t see them?

One would assume NASA, in connection with its own UFO study currently underway, would be peer-reviewing this work?

Well, whoever peer-reviews it, is should be interesting to see whether these findings are confirmed or supported by other experts.

Congress is concerned about those ‘transmedium’ UFOs, but the Pentagon is not

There has been a lot of chatter lately about how Congress is concerned about the slow pace of investigations into those transmedium UFOs, so named because they can traverse the oceans, the atmosphere and space with equal ease. Popular Science lays out the disconnect between the nation’s civilian leadership and the military.

https://www.popsci.com/technology/congress-unidentified-aerial-phenomenon-concerns/

I would respectfully submit to the conversation the simple observation that there can be only one logical reason for the Pentagon to be unconcerned about the alleged threat these UFOs pose: The DoD knows these aren’t ET, they aren’t from other nations or the private sector. They are above-top-secret U.S. military weapons known only to a small, extremely compartmentalized group within the Pentagon.

Following this line of reasoning, this would mean even other parts of the military establishment are unaware of this secret program. Congress doesn’t have a need to know, the public doesn’t have a need to know, and even our largely civilian space program, NASA, doesn’t have a need to know.

Maybe NASA’s UFO investigation is all about propulsion, not ET

So, regarding NASA’s announcement that it will seriously investigate UFOs, perhaps it’s all about propulsion, not space aliens.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/06/13/head-nasa-taking-ufos-seriously/

In other words, maybe the big brains at NASA don’t think it’s ET. Maybe they are just recognizing, FINALLY, that someone on planet Earth has achieved an astounding propulsion breakthrough.

And, oh, by the way, wouldn’t it be advantageous for the world’s premier space agency to get its hands on such a technology? A serious scientific study of UFOs could reveal clues about how this propulsion system works.

You know my take. I think the Tic Tac and other similar craft are above-top-secret U.S. military hardware. In other words, the Pentagon is the entity that has achieved said propulsion breakthrough. Of course, if such a breakthrough existed, you wouldn’t expect the Pentagon to share it with ANYONE, and that includes NASA. No one would have a “need to know,” not even Congress or the president.

But that’s just my weird, paranoid mind …

Pentagon has super-advanced propulsion tech, says retired AF general

According to the War Zone, retired Lt. Gen. Steven L. Kwast has just dropped this bombshell: The Pentagon has a super-advanced technology capable of traveling anywhere in the world within one hour.

The article is here: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31445/recently-retired-usaf-general-makes-eyebrow-raising-claims-about-advanced-space-technology

The War Zone article also mentions that, taken together with other cryptic comments from military officials recently, we may be on the verge of something.

Is it finally time to unveil the flying saucers?